2023
DOI: 10.3390/insects14030227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Color-Patterned Species of Microtendipes Kieffer, 1913 (Diptera: Chironomidae) and a Deep Intraspecific Divergence of Species by DNA Barcodes

Abstract: The genus Microtendipes Kieffer (Diptera: Chironomidae) has a nearly worldwide distribution, comprising more than 60 species, which are further divided into two species groups based on larval stage. However, species delimitation and identification among the adults of this genus are controversial and uncertain. For instance, previous studies have provided many synonymies based on conspecific color pattern variations in Microtendipes species. Here, we used DNA barcode data to address Microtendipes species delimi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the variable sites occurred in the third codon position. The average intraspecific divergence was 4.27%, which is higher than that in previous studies (0.9-2.8) [12,[35][36][37][38][39]. The high intraspecific divergence in our study can be attributed to four species (Stictochironomus sticticus (Fabricius): 16.81%; Stictochironomus pictulus (Meigen): 14.41%; Stictochironomus akizuki (Tokunaga): 15.56%; and Stictochironomus juncaii Qin, Shi and Wang: 9.35%; Table 2).…”
Section: Barcode Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the variable sites occurred in the third codon position. The average intraspecific divergence was 4.27%, which is higher than that in previous studies (0.9-2.8) [12,[35][36][37][38][39]. The high intraspecific divergence in our study can be attributed to four species (Stictochironomus sticticus (Fabricius): 16.81%; Stictochironomus pictulus (Meigen): 14.41%; Stictochironomus akizuki (Tokunaga): 15.56%; and Stictochironomus juncaii Qin, Shi and Wang: 9.35%; Table 2).…”
Section: Barcode Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Chironomidae have evolved a diverse range of pigmentation patterns on different body parts, including the abdomen, thorax, wings, and legs [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. The genus Stictochironomus is widely distributed, occurring in all biogeographical regions except Antarctica, and is characterized by a combination of distinctive wing and leg markings, lack of frontal setae, conical scutal tubercle, fused tibial combs, usually with only one spur, and a distally flattened gonostylus with mobile inferior volsella bent laterally [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A alta taxa de mutações presentes no gene mitocondrial citocromo c oxidase subunidade I (COI), fez com que esse marcador fosse sugerido universalmente como DNA barcoding para as espécies de animais (HEBERT et al, 2003;SUJEEVAN;HEBERT, 2007). O número de estudos envolvendo DNA Barcoding para diferentes espécies vem crescendo exponencialmente nas últimas décadas, colaborando para resolução de problemáticas taxonômicas, descoberta de espécies crípticas, na identificação de insetos imaturos e até mesmo quando a amostragem inclui apenas partes do corpo de um inseto (ARAUJO et al, 2023;CHO et al, 2013;DESALLE;GOLDSTEIN, 2019;HAUSMANN et al, 2020;JALALI et al, 2015;KRUPITSKY et al, 2023;LI et al, 2020;SONG et al, 2018SONG et al, , 2023. Além disso, a produção de DNA barcoding é primordial para aplicação de técnicas de ampla identificação de espécies como metabarcoding, que hoje são utilizadas para o entendimento da diversidade ecológica de espécies e as interações entre as mesmas nas comunidades (CLARKE et al, 2014;DOPHEIDE et al, 2019;EVANS;KITSON, 2020;KRESS et al, 2015;VALENTINI et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified