Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
In depleted gas wells, the produced gas rate and consequently the velocity will drop to the extent that produced liquids are no longer carried to surface. The liquids accumulate in the well bore, increasing the sand face pressure. This further reduces the inflow, so that more liquid collects and eventually the flow dies down completely. This phenomenon is known as liquid loading. Velocity strings are a commonly applied remedy to liquid loading in gas wells. By installing a small diameter string inside the tubing, the flow area is reduced which increases the velocity and restores liquid transport to surface. The disadvantage of the velocity string is the increase in frictional pressure drop, constraining production. Hence an optimal velocity string has to be selected such that liquid loading is delayed over a long period with a minimal impact on production. This requires accurate methods to predict pressure drop in the velocity string as well as tubing-velocity string annulus. The available methods to predict pressure drop in annuli for gas-liquid flow are modifications of methods to predict wet gas pressure drop in tubing. These modifications are usually based on assumptions, which are strictly valid only for single-phase flow. Their validity for gas-liquid flow is questionable. Hence to assess the validity of the methods a field test was designed and executed. The results were compared with various approaches to describe wet gas flow in an annulus. This allowed selection of the best approach with an accuracy comparable to the accuracy of methods to predict pressure drop in tubing. Factors affecting the accuracy were identified. Comparison with a field case provided further proof for the validity of the approach. This result is not only relevant for velocity string design, it is important for all annular flow processes in wells such as flow around a stinger, drill pipe, tool or coiled tubing string. Introduction When there is sufficient reservoir energy and gas wells can be produced at medium to high rates, co-production of liquids is seldom a problem, even at high liquid to gas ratio's (LGR). Although the liquid slips through the gas, effectively the gas-liquid mixture tends to behave like a single phase liquid flowing to surface, where the phases can be separated and processed. This changes when the reservoir depletes, the reservoir pressure drops and the produced gas rates decline. The velocity at which the gas moves upward approaches the terminal velocity at which liquid droplets would fall downward in a stagnant gas1,2. This means more liquid will be retained in the casing or tubing. The consequence of liquid accumulation in the well is an increase in the hydrostatical pressure drop over the well. Since the well head pressure is usually kept constant by the surface facilities, the increase in pressure drop over the well leads to an increase of the pressure at sand face. In turn an increased pressure at sand face gives rise to a reduction of the inflow of gas and liquids, reducing the gas velocity even further so that more liquid is accumulated. The well is said to load up with liquid and flow ceases altogether (or in the best case some gas continues to bubble upward through a liquid column). Several approaches have been suggested and tried to prevent or delay the loading process, such as3,4: Of these approaches, installation of a velocity string, i.e. a small diameter tubing or coiled tubing inside the actual tubing to increase velocity and improve liquid transport, is one of the most attractive options since it is low cost, can be carried out under pressure (i.e. there is no need to kill the well) and requires no further maintenance after installation. Apart from mechanical considerations, such as interference with the SSSV, the main drawback of the velocity string is that the introduction of the string increases the frictional flow resistance in the well. This inevitably leads to a reduction of the productivity of the well. Hence the price for the suppression of liquid loading is decreased production. This makes selection of the optimum size of the velocity string critical. It has to be selected such that liquid loading is avoided or at least delayed over a considerable period of time, whilst maintaining the highest possible production.
Plunger lift technology has been applied systematically and successfully to unload liquids from marginal tight gas and coalbed methane wells in San Juan North Basin. This article presents the recommended practices, case studies, and results of excellent plunger lift application and optimization. A production increment of over 4 MMcfd has been achieved and sustained on about 40 plunger lift installations. Most wells that were chosen for plunger installations were either on a plug and abandon (P&A) list or on temporary abandon (TA) status. Neither gas production nor anticipated production uplift from wells could justify installation of a more costly artificial lift system such as sucker-rod pump to de-water wells. Amazingly, production uplift of more than 200 Mcfd, and/or production increment of over 300%, was realized on some wells. It important to note that many operations use the practice of surfacing plungers by auto-venting, thereby releasing greenhouse gas (GHG) into the atmosphere. Plungers were operated successfully in San Juan North operations without this practice. All these results were achieved through applications of new plunger lift technology, efficient plunger type selection, monthly and quarterly reviews, proper maintenance, optimization and monitoring, i.e. effective utilization of plunger lift data. The strong alliance that was formed with the plunger equipment provider was one of the important inputs to our plunger lift journey. This new approach is a significant departure from the conventional ways of operating plungers, whereby service companies traditionally supply plunger hardware to the producing companies to operate with little "service" involved. Also, the field operations' teams, with their perseverance, offered a very important contribution to this successful venture. Introduction Gas wells, as a result of depleting reservoir pressure, show a decrease in production over time. The liquids that are associated with the produced gas tend to accumulate in the gas well. The associated liquids could be water, oils or condensates. This liquid loading heightens and futher reduces the gas flow rate. Turner et al.1 and Coleman et al.2 models, give the minimum gas flow rates required to lift the entrained liquid droplets at certain wellhead pressure. There are a host of artificial lift methods3 available to de-liquefy gas wells, one such method being plunger lift. Given the consideration of low rates, economic feasability, well characteristics and mechanical integrity, plunger lift became the obvious choice. Plunger lift is an intermittent form of artificial lift which utilizes the natural energy of the reservoir to lift the liquids out of the wellbore. The feasibility and consideration of plunger lifts are discussed in the literature4–9. This article brings to light success stories of wells with low flow rates that were not producing to their full potential and would at times have to be shut in to build up pressure. The operator and plunger provider tie-up coupled with vital input from the field helped establish a setup wherein regular monitoring and field input resulted in a production increment of over 4 MMcfd for about 40 wells. The wells were chosen on the basis of their plunger viability, and plunger selection was made based upon sealing, depth of down-hole stop, bottomhole pressures, line pressure, annular communication, sand and paraffin production, etc. The availablity of the SCADA system allowed dynamic monitoring of changes and their effect on the wells. In addition to conventional plunger lift, multi-stage plunger lift technology was used, and plunger enhanced chamber lift (PECLTM) 10 is being considered for the future. Details are provided in the following sub-sections. Geology San Juan Basin, which runs along northwestern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado (Fig. A-1), is one of the most prolific natural gas producing regions in North America. The three major reservoirs, namely upper cretaceous Dakota, Mesa Verde group and Pictured Cliffs sandstone (Fig. A-2), have produced 22 Tcf of gas as of 2004 according to Fassett et al11. The Basin and Blanco Fruitland coal, which overlies the Pictured Cliffs sand (Fig. A-2), conformably holds a resource base on the order of 50 Tcf of coal bed methane (CBM) as per Kelso et al12.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.