1998
DOI: 10.1080/14781159808412845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New constitutionalism, democratisation and global political economy∗

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
119
0
17

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
119
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…NGOs in particular not only criticized the supposedly 'neoliberal' substance (e.g. Gill, 1998), but also the procedural characteristics of the trade system. They argued that since trade negotiations now have a more direct and significant impact on citizens' daily life, the trade system needs to be made more transparent and include non-traditional players in the process (Goldman, 1994;Hopewell, 2015).…”
Section: Why Transparency Became An Issue In the Trade Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGOs in particular not only criticized the supposedly 'neoliberal' substance (e.g. Gill, 1998), but also the procedural characteristics of the trade system. They argued that since trade negotiations now have a more direct and significant impact on citizens' daily life, the trade system needs to be made more transparent and include non-traditional players in the process (Goldman, 1994;Hopewell, 2015).…”
Section: Why Transparency Became An Issue In the Trade Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu zengin literatürün ağırlık merkezini yapısal analizler oluşturmaktadır. 1970'lerde dünya kapitalist sistemin ne tür bir yapısal kriz içerisinde olduğu, neoliberalizmin bu kriz durumuna nasıl bir çözüm önerdiği ve bu paradigma etrafında ne tür kurumsal-yapısal dönüşümler gerçekleştiğine dair çokça çalışma bulunmaktadır (Gill 1998;Munck 2002;Mcnally 2010). Öte yandan, neoliberalizmin ideolojiler alanında yarattığı dönüşümler konusunda benzer zenginliktebir araştırma gündemi oluştuğunu söylemek mümkün değildir.…”
Section: Arş Gör Melih Yeşilbağ Ankara üNiversitesi Dil Tarih Coğraunclassified
“…In such a fraught environment the maintenance of social order would appear to rest not so much upon popular 'acquiescence', as a reflex response by the state towards greater authoritarianism in suppressing dissent. It would appear that when necessary, the authoritarian reflex of post-communism does not reside simply in the realm of the aggressive promotion of free-market ideology and hyper-individualism ('disciplinary' neoliberalism) [86]but on the exercise of the ultimate power of the state and its monopoly of the instruments offorce.…”
Section: Implications For Policing: Democracy and Dissent In Post-commentioning
confidence: 99%