2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New constraints on the age of the opening of the South Atlantic basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 ). They were emplaced between the oceanic anomalies M10-M11 (135 Ma) in the south 56 and M2 (128 Ma) in the north 57 .…”
Section: Archetypal Rifted Margins Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 ). They were emplaced between the oceanic anomalies M10-M11 (135 Ma) in the south 56 and M2 (128 Ma) in the north 57 .…”
Section: Archetypal Rifted Margins Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between the Falkland-Agulhas fracture zone and the Walvis Ridge/Rio Grande Rise (Fig. 4), this process lasted for approximately 5 Myrs as shown by the earliest magnetic chrons in the South Atlantic (Koopmann et al, 2016;Hall et al, 2018).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is still some uncertainty about the age of the first oceanic crust near the Falkland Plateau, where strike-slip deformation from the Falklands-Agulhas fracture zone hampers identification of the earliest spreading anomalies. Collier et al (2017) and Hall et al (2018) Most of the southern South Atlantic continental margins are volcanic (Gladczenko et al, 1997;Becker et al, 2014;Foulger, 2017) (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Rifting and Magmatismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2021). Several studies of the evolution of the South Atlantic Ocean interpreted SDR‐related magnetic anomalies as a continuation of the oceanic crust by disregarding their geometry or the origin of the magnetic anomalies close to the coast (e.g., Chauvet et al., 2021; Collier et al., 2017; Granot & Dyment, 2015; Hall et al., 2018; Koopmann et al., 2016; Moulin et al., 2010; Rabinowitz & LaBrecque, 1979; Stica et al., 2014), which occur due to the magnetic susceptibility contrast rather than remanent magnetism (Davis et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%