2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-019-00649-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New covering codes of radius R, codimension tR and $$tR+\frac{R}{2}$$, and saturating sets in projective spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case l q (5, 3) < 2.884q 2 3 (lnq) 1 3 was proved, see [5]. More generally the following result follows from the bound in [14].…”
Section: For a Code Family Of Lengthmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case l q (5, 3) < 2.884q 2 3 (lnq) 1 3 was proved, see [5]. More generally the following result follows from the bound in [14].…”
Section: For a Code Family Of Lengthmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Actually this can be proved directly from the the characterization of the covering radius of linear codes from its parity check matrix. There are a lot of results about this topic, we refer to [13,14,5] and references therein. From our covering code upper bounds the size of an (R, L) list-decodable code C of length n satisfying n ≥ l q (r, R) has to satisfy…”
Section: For a Code Family Of Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, improvements on the upper bound on the minimum size of a ρ-saturating set have been obtained in [17,18]. Theorem 4.3 ([18]).…”
Section: Theorem 42 ([16]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length function l q (r, R) is the smallest length of a q-ary linear code of co-dimension r and covering radius R. There is a one-to-one correspondence between [n, n − r] q R codes and (R − 1)-saturating sets of size n in PG(r − 1, q). This implies l q (r, R) = s q (r − 1, R − 1) [17,18]. Applying a random construction based on point sets of subspaces in the spirit of higgledy-piggledy line sets (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%