2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New criterion to determine left bundle branch capture on the basis of individualized His bundle or right ventricular septal pacing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal cutoff of ∆LVAT2% (∆LVAT2/LVAT RVSP ) for differentiating LBBP from LVSP was 21.2%, with a sensitivity of 84.0% and a specificity of 100%. Among patients with HF, ∆LVAT1 >9.0 ms and ∆LVAT1% >9.8% have been found to have high accuracy in indicating LBB capture [24]. Vijayaraman et al have also reported that an absolute value of 8 ms for the difference in RWPTs (∆RWPT) during HBP and ns-LBBP/LVSP is highly accurate (sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 93.3%) in confirming LBB capture in patients with LBBB [23].…”
Section: ∆Lvat Based On Individual Hbp and Rvspmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal cutoff of ∆LVAT2% (∆LVAT2/LVAT RVSP ) for differentiating LBBP from LVSP was 21.2%, with a sensitivity of 84.0% and a specificity of 100%. Among patients with HF, ∆LVAT1 >9.0 ms and ∆LVAT1% >9.8% have been found to have high accuracy in indicating LBB capture [24]. Vijayaraman et al have also reported that an absolute value of 8 ms for the difference in RWPTs (∆RWPT) during HBP and ns-LBBP/LVSP is highly accurate (sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 93.3%) in confirming LBB capture in patients with LBBB [23].…”
Section: ∆Lvat Based On Individual Hbp and Rvspmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because LBBP captures the distal HB, the fastest activation of the LV lateral wall and the shortest LVAT have been observed with this method [23]. Qian et al have developed a personalized LBB capture criterion based on patients' intrinsic HBP and RVSP electrical parameters during implantation [24]. A total of 105 patients were enrolled: 80 with normal cardiac function and 25 with HF.…”
Section: ∆Lvat Based On Individual Hbp and Rvspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V6RWPT <85 ms (in patients with severely dilated LV or conduction system disease, the accepted cutoff may be <90 ms). [ 33 , 34 ]…”
Section: Currently Accepted Criteria For Left Bundle Branch Area Pacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 36 , 37 ] However, when compared with LBB pacing, LVSP has been associated with significantly longer left ventricular activation time in V5-V6 and longer paced QRS durations. [ 33 , 38 ] Consequently, this could potentially lead to a decrease in LV synchrony. [ 39 ] In patients with HF, LBB pacing was associated with a significant reduction in the composite outcome of HF-related hospitalisation and all-cause mortality compared with LVSP (Cox proportional HR: 0.36, 95% CI [0.197–0.654]; p=0.001).…”
Section: Currently Accepted Criteria For Left Bundle Branch Area Pacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation