2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2015.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New data about small-magnitude earthquakes of the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent data and interpretations of the Gakkel Ridge structure, mostly its western part, are presented in several studies (Schmidt-Aursch and Jokat, 2016;Morozov et al, 2016;Michael et al, 2003;Jokat et al, 2003;Urlaub et al, 2009;Jokat and Micksch, 2004;Cochran et al, 2003;Schlindwein et al, 2005Schlindwein et al, , 2015Jokat and Schmidt-Aursch, 2007;Cochran, 2008;Engen et al, 2009). Current knowledge indicates that the present day mid-ocean ridge has a very thin crust, c. 2-6 km thick (Urlaub et al, 2009;Schmidt-Aursch and Jokat, 2016), and is segmented in non-volcanic and sparselyvolcanic segments, with deep earthquakes in the amagmatic sections (at c. 35 km depth; Schlindwein and Schmid, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More recent data and interpretations of the Gakkel Ridge structure, mostly its western part, are presented in several studies (Schmidt-Aursch and Jokat, 2016;Morozov et al, 2016;Michael et al, 2003;Jokat et al, 2003;Urlaub et al, 2009;Jokat and Micksch, 2004;Cochran et al, 2003;Schlindwein et al, 2005Schlindwein et al, , 2015Jokat and Schmidt-Aursch, 2007;Cochran, 2008;Engen et al, 2009). Current knowledge indicates that the present day mid-ocean ridge has a very thin crust, c. 2-6 km thick (Urlaub et al, 2009;Schmidt-Aursch and Jokat, 2016), and is segmented in non-volcanic and sparselyvolcanic segments, with deep earthquakes in the amagmatic sections (at c. 35 km depth; Schlindwein and Schmid, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, the spatial distribution of earthquakes (red circles) recorded by the SVZ station during 2017 and processed using wave forms from other seismic stations installed in the Arctic region is shown in Figure 3, in which the earthquake processing results recorded by the SVZ station only are presented also. Location of earthquake epicenters is reliant on the hodograph type which is absent for the central part of the Arctic Ocean; as a result, we use the NOES [19] or BARENTS [20] regional hodographs. As a result, we can determine the most likely areas of their location roughly.…”
Section: Results Of the Unified Seismic Catalog Which Makes Use Of Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in the seismic network across the European Arctic have led to an increased monitoring capability over an extended region (Antonovskaya et al 2014). Seismicity on the Gakkel Ridge, north of Svalbard, has been analyzed teleseismically (Engen et al 2003;Korger & Schlindwein 2012), locally (Korger & Schlindwein 2013), and now with an improved prospect of monitoring with permanent regional stations (Morozov et al 2016). There is more diffuse seismicity along the coast of Greenland, on and around Svalbard and, for example, between the spreading ridge and the Continental Ocean Transition near Bear Island (Czuba et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%