New Designs or New Practices? Multiple Perspectives on the ICT and Accessibility Conundrum

Heiman, Tali; Coughlan, Tim; Rangin, Hadi Bargi; Deimann, Markus

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37125-8_5

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[19], [108]- [110]), reflections on these topics do not seem to be integrated in the work of researchers who develop new applications. Creating inclusive and responsible technologies from the start is most beneficial because it takes more time, effort, and money to remediate inaccessible technologies [18]. To address this mismatch, Selwyn [110] suggested including ethics as a mandatory subject in the curricula of data scientists and those in charge of procurement decisions in higher education institutions.…”

Section: A To What Extent Are Ethical Concerns Considered In Articles...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Could the Use of AI in Higher Education Hinder Students With Disabilities? A Scoping Review

Pierrès,

Christen,

Schmitt-Koopmann

et al. 2024

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Literature reviews on artificial intelligence (AI) have focused on the different applications of AI in higher education, the AI techniques used, and the benefits/risks of the use of AI. One of the greatest potentials of AI is to personalize higher education to the needs of students and offer timely feedback. This could benefit students with disabilities tremendously if their needs are also considered in the development of new AI educational technologies (EdTech). However, current reviews have failed to address the perspective of students with disabilities, which prompts ethical concerns. For instance, AI could treat people with disabilities as outliers in the data and end up discriminating against them. For that reason, this systematic literature review raises the following two questions: To what extent are ethical concerns considered in articles presenting AI applications assessing students (with disabilities) in higher education? What are the potential risks of using AI that assess students with disabilities in higher education? This scoping review highlights the lack of ethical reflection on AI technologies and an absence of discussion and inclusion of people with disabilities. Moreover, it identifies eight risks associated with the use of AI EdTech for students with disabilities. The review concludes with suggestions on how to mitigate these potential risks. Specifically, it advocates for increased attention to ethics within the field, the involvement of people with disabilities in research and development, as well as careful adoption of AI EdTech in higher education.

show abstract

Section: A To What Extent Are Ethical Concerns Considered In Articles...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, these benefits can only be achieved if the needs of people with disabilities are considered in the development and adoption of AI EdTech. As Heiman et al [18] note, failing to account for accessibility needs during technology development can lead to increased costs and lengthier processes for people with disabilities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%