New developments in India concerning the policy of passive euthanasia

Abstract

Euthanasia and assisted dying are illegal in India according to Sections 306 and 309 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and Article 21 of the Constitution of India. There have been a number of cases where the Indian High Courts and Indian Supreme Court issued differing verdicts concerning the right to life and the right to die. Nevertheless, on 7 March 2011, a paradigm shift happened as a result of the Indian Supreme Court's judgment on involuntary passive euthanasia in the case of Aruna Shanbaug. In its judgment, the Supreme Court requested the government to prepare a law on euthanasia. Accordingly, the 241st Report of the Law Commission of India proposed a bill to permit passive euthanasia. In May 2016 the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) issued the draft bill for public comment in order to create an informed decision. The Indian people are divided on the issue of euthanasia. The majority of the scientific community welcome it, while some religious groups oppose it. Hindus, in general, express both supporting and opposing views on euthanasia, whereas, Christians and Muslims have hardened their opposition against it. The Supreme Court judgment and the Report of the Law Commission pave the way for the development of new policies pertaining to passive euthanasia by the central government of India. Once such legislation is passed, passive euthanasia may, and probably will, have an enormous impact on the cultural, political, public and medical spheres of India in the near future.

Communication About End of Life for Patients Living With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Evidence

“…For example, discussions about end of life may occur in tandem with decisions about initiating, continuing, and/or discontinuing life-sustaining interventions such as mechanical ventilation or enteral feeding tubes. Attitudes toward end-of-life options, including voluntary assisted death, vary across regions and cultures ( 28 , 160 , 161 ). With high mobility within populations, increasing attention to the influence of culture and personal beliefs on advance care planning and decisions for people with ALS ( 41 , 118 , 120 , 162 ), and increasing access to voluntary assisted death in many jurisdictions ( 28 , 29 ), the need for patient-centered evidence and communication guidance is increasingly important for sensitive, effective communication about palliative care and end-of-life options.…”

Demonstrating The Importance of Cultural Considerations At End-Of-Life Utilising The Perspective of Indian Patients With Cancer

“…Interestingly, while some patients in the current study endorsed euthanasia, they felt that legalising it would re ect badly upon the Indian government. This shows that they were unaware of the ongoing national debate in India on the legalization of passive euthanasia [42]. However, they also equated the concept of DNR orders (to limit cardiopulmonary resuscitation) with euthanasia.…”