2014
DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000000100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘New’ direct oral anticoagulants in the perioperative setting

Abstract: NOACs like dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban are effective alternatives to warfarin in primary and secondary prophylaxis of thromboembolic conditions. In the perioperative setting, some uncertainties and evidence gaps remain in estimating the bleeding risks associated with surgical procedures, emergency trauma and neuroaxial anesthesia. A discontinuation of NOACs should be at least 1 day before elective operation. Renal and liver impairment, older age, or co-medications could afford long… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
15
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In this survey, almost 90 % of all respondents considered the preinjury intake of anticoagulants including NOACs as an increasing risk to bleeding trauma patients and half of all respondents declared these drugs to potentially cause ''major'' problems when treating these patients as no specific reversal agents are yet available [36]. However, there seem to be geographical differences for the existence of this threat as these novel agents are prescribed predominately in the developed countries, but this needs to be further evaluated based upon the data obtained from this survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this survey, almost 90 % of all respondents considered the preinjury intake of anticoagulants including NOACs as an increasing risk to bleeding trauma patients and half of all respondents declared these drugs to potentially cause ''major'' problems when treating these patients as no specific reversal agents are yet available [36]. However, there seem to be geographical differences for the existence of this threat as these novel agents are prescribed predominately in the developed countries, but this needs to be further evaluated based upon the data obtained from this survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we recommend discontinuing warfarin 5 days prior to the procedure and monitoring the INR to ensure that it has normalised. In the event that urgent reversal is needed, we recommend normalising the coagulopathy with use of reversal agents [31][32][33][34][35] if clinically possible before the procedure. However, clinical discretion, urgency of the procedure and benefit versus risk should be taken into account before the decision is made to proceed with or forgo these procedures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of NOAC, like the use of LMWH, can be associated with epidural hematoma [46,57,58]. None of the NOAC should be given until at least 6 h after epidural catheter removal.…”
Section: Recommendations For the Perioperative Management Of Noacsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the NOAC should be given until at least 6 h after epidural catheter removal. If traumatic lumbar puncture occurred (when placing the epidural catheter), then dosing should be delayed for 24 h [57,58].…”
Section: Recommendations For the Perioperative Management Of Noacsmentioning
confidence: 99%