International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Directions for Nature of Science Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
128
0
30

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
128
0
30
Order By: Relevance
“…As an alternative to consensus view of science, another perspective named "Family Resemblance Approach (FRA)" is defended recently by some of the scholars as a "more comprehensive and systematic" (Irzik & Nola, 2011, p.593) account of NOS, which encompasses both domain-general and domain-specific characteristics of science, to be presented to students (e.g. Dagher & Erduran, 2016;Irzik & Nola, 2014). FRA was first introduced to the discipline of philosophy by Wittgenstein (1958) and popularized in science education by Irzik & Nola (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an alternative to consensus view of science, another perspective named "Family Resemblance Approach (FRA)" is defended recently by some of the scholars as a "more comprehensive and systematic" (Irzik & Nola, 2011, p.593) account of NOS, which encompasses both domain-general and domain-specific characteristics of science, to be presented to students (e.g. Dagher & Erduran, 2016;Irzik & Nola, 2014). FRA was first introduced to the discipline of philosophy by Wittgenstein (1958) and popularized in science education by Irzik & Nola (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FRA was first introduced to the discipline of philosophy by Wittgenstein (1958) and popularized in science education by Irzik & Nola (2011). FRA conceptualizes science as a cognitive-epistemic and social-institutional system and offers a pedagogically more holistic and contextualized way of articulating NOS concepts (Irzik & Nola, 2014). Whereas cognitive-epistemic aspects of science cover "processes of inquiry, aims and values, methods and methodological rules, and scientific knowledge" (Erduran & Dagher, 2014, p.20), social-institutional aspects of science include "professional activities, scientific ethos, social certification and dissemination of scientific knowledge, and social values" (Erduran & Dagher, 2014, p.20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this rich and dynamic character of science, he suggests that ''it is useful to understand NOS, not as some list of necessary and sufficient conditions for a practice to be scientific, but rather as something that, following Wittengenstein's terminology, identifies 'a family resemblance of features' that warrant different enterprises being called scientific'' (p. 388). Accordingly, science educators should work with ''a more relaxed, contextual and heterogeneous 'features of science' (FOS)'' (p. 389), in line with the family resemblance approach (Irzik and Nola 2014;Erduran and Dagher 2014).…”
Section: Science and Worldviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee ja Butler (2003) ehdottivat kolmea elementtiä, jotka pitää muuntaa tutkimuksesta opetukseen, jotta tiedeopetus olisi autenttista: (i) sisältö, (ii) tieteellinen ajattelu, ja (iii) resurssit. Toiset ovat korostaneet, että autenttiseen opetukseen kuuluu myös tieteelle ominaiset arvot ja sosiaalinen vuorovaikutus (Edelson, 1998) sekä muut sosiaalis-institutionaaliset piirteet (Erduran & Dagher, 2014;Irzik & Nola, 2014).…”
Section: Tavoitteiden Tarkastelu Relevanssin Ja Autenttisuuden Näkökuunclassified