2021
DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2021.1924813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Directions in Auditing Research: Conceptual Repair, Technological Disruption(s), Local Professional Governance and the Battle for Inclusivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such conflicts are also alluded to in research that looks at how the accounting profession participates in standards setting in other ways. For instance, members of the profession act on U.S. and international standards-setting boards (Allen & Ramanna, 2013;Baudot, 2018) or in the technical departments of these boards, the latter of which we know relatively little about (Malsch & O'Dwyer, 2021). Botzem (2012) implicates the accounting profession as significant funders of the IASB, comprising a critical number of board memberships.…”
Section: Influencing Accounting Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such conflicts are also alluded to in research that looks at how the accounting profession participates in standards setting in other ways. For instance, members of the profession act on U.S. and international standards-setting boards (Allen & Ramanna, 2013;Baudot, 2018) or in the technical departments of these boards, the latter of which we know relatively little about (Malsch & O'Dwyer, 2021). Botzem (2012) implicates the accounting profession as significant funders of the IASB, comprising a critical number of board memberships.…”
Section: Influencing Accounting Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%