2016
DOI: 10.1017/s104909651600072x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Directions in Legislative Research: Lessons from Inside Congress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…scholars, practitioners, and observers typically portray committee influence as rooted in traditional congressional processes and practices, which are thought to provide committees with powerful opportunities to block and shape legislation. this perspective permeates college-level american government textbooks 1 and is shared by many members of Congress (see Crespin and Madonna 2016). scholars connect committee influence to the gatekeeping rights, agenda setting and proposal abilities, and conference committee practices of the "regular order" Congress (denzau and Mackay 1983;ripley 1983;shepsle and Weingast 1987;snyder 1992;Weingast and Marshall 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…scholars, practitioners, and observers typically portray committee influence as rooted in traditional congressional processes and practices, which are thought to provide committees with powerful opportunities to block and shape legislation. this perspective permeates college-level american government textbooks 1 and is shared by many members of Congress (see Crespin and Madonna 2016). scholars connect committee influence to the gatekeeping rights, agenda setting and proposal abilities, and conference committee practices of the "regular order" Congress (denzau and Mackay 1983;ripley 1983;shepsle and Weingast 1987;snyder 1992;Weingast and Marshall 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%