2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0098-3004(04)00057-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New discrimination techniques for Euler deconvolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SI must be chosen according to a prior knowledge of the source geometry. For example, in gravity case, SI=2 for a sphere, SI=1 for a horizontal cylinder, SI=0 for a fault, and SI=-1 for a contact (FitzGerald et al, 2004). The two horizontal gradients (& / &x, & /&y ) and vertical (& /&z ) derivatives (Fig.…”
Section: Euler Deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SI must be chosen according to a prior knowledge of the source geometry. For example, in gravity case, SI=2 for a sphere, SI=1 for a horizontal cylinder, SI=0 for a fault, and SI=-1 for a contact (FitzGerald et al, 2004). The two horizontal gradients (& / &x, & /&y ) and vertical (& /&z ) derivatives (Fig.…”
Section: Euler Deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional wisdom is to make the convolution window width not less than half the maximum expected depth to the source (FITZGERALD et al, 2004 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SI must be chosen according to prior knowledge of the source geometry. For example, SI = 2 for a sphere, SI = 1 for a horizontal cylinder, SI = 0 for a fault, and SI = −1 for a contact (FitzGerald et al, 2004). The two horizontal gradients (∂g/∂ x, ∂g/∂ y) and the vertical gradient (∂g/∂z) are used to compute the anomalous source locations.…”
Section: Euler Deconvolution Of Gravity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%