2019
DOI: 10.1111/anec.12669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New electrocardiographic score for the prediction of atrial fibrillation: The MVP ECG risk score (morphology‐voltage‐P‐wave duration)

Abstract: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice and has a cumulative global burden of more than 33.5 million people (Chugh et al., 2013). Atrial fibrillation carries a significant increase in the risk of major embolic events such as stroke as well as an increased risk of heart failure and death (Alonso

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
14

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
47
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of advanced and partial IAB is 1% and 9.7% respectively, in the general population and they are both associated with increased risk of AF [7]. Its prevalence increases with age, reaching a prevalence of 26% of advanced IAB and 20.1% of partial IAB in individuals > 100 years of age [11]. Aging is associated with a progressive increase in the degree of atrial fibrosis and modification in the cardiac conduction system, which can be associated with IAB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of advanced and partial IAB is 1% and 9.7% respectively, in the general population and they are both associated with increased risk of AF [7]. Its prevalence increases with age, reaching a prevalence of 26% of advanced IAB and 20.1% of partial IAB in individuals > 100 years of age [11]. Aging is associated with a progressive increase in the degree of atrial fibrosis and modification in the cardiac conduction system, which can be associated with IAB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interval between the earliest and the latest detection of atrial depolarization will be used. The following ECG parameters will be included to evaluate LA and right atrial (RA) abnormalities (Alexander et al, 2019;Hancock et al, 2009;Kaplan, Evans, Foster, Lim, & Schiller, 1994;Lee et al, 2007;Tsao et al, 2008).…”
Section: P-wave Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria applied for diagnosis of left atrial (LA) abnormality using electrocardiogram (ECG) are based on various parameters including P‐wave duration ≥ 120 ms, the classic Morris index (increase in P‐wave terminal force in V 1 [PtfV 1 ], with terminal negativity of P wave in V 1 < −0.1 mV and duration >0.04 s) (Morris, Estes, Whalen, & Thompson, 1964), P‐wave morphology in inferior leads, P voltage in lead I, P‐wave area/axis, and P‐wave score(Alexander et al., 2019). These criteria have high specificity (85%–90%) but low sensitivity (Josephson, Kastor, & Morganroth, 1977; Tsao et al., 2008; Bayes de Luna, 2012) and can also be used for diagnosis of interatrial block (IAB).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better knowledge of IAB, a separate entity from left atrial enlargement [54] that is associated with AF and stroke [55,56], is essential to clarify the correct future approach in these patients. Also, the influence of other P-wave indexes in the prognosis should be taken into consideration in the decisionmaking process.…”
Section: Iab and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant (Tavi)mentioning
confidence: 99%