Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1089803.1090006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New energy saving mechanisms for mobile ad-hoc networks using OLSR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A combination of both categories is also suggested in other studies. As examples of previous studies under the first category, both [26,27], focus on modifying the MPR selection mechanism of the original OLSR protocol by considering the residual energy levels instead of two-hop neighbors of the node. Furthermore, in [28], authors proposed a Fuzzy logic based on the MPR selection mechanism, called QMPR.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of both categories is also suggested in other studies. As examples of previous studies under the first category, both [26,27], focus on modifying the MPR selection mechanism of the original OLSR protocol by considering the residual energy levels instead of two-hop neighbors of the node. Furthermore, in [28], authors proposed a Fuzzy logic based on the MPR selection mechanism, called QMPR.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there are many proposals which try to define an energy efficient routing protocol, capable of routing data over the network and of saving the battery power of mobile nodes (Toh, 2001;Jones et al, 2001;Lindsey et al, 2001;Wan et al, 2001;Kim et al, 2003;Jinet al, 2005;Taddia et al, 2005). Such proposals are often completely new, while others aim to add energy-aware functionalities to existing protocols, like AODV (Senouci & Naimi, 2005;Jung et al, 2005), DSR Luo et al, 2003) and OLSR (Ghanem et al, 2005;Benslimane et al, 2006;Guo & Malakooti, 2007). The aim of energy-aware routing protocols is to reduce energy consumption in transmission of packets between a source and a destination, to avoid routing of packets through nodes with low residual energy, to optimize flooding of routing information over the network and to avoid interference and medium collisions.…”
Section: Energy Saving Techniques At Routing Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In OLSR, for example, the MPR selection mechanism can be varied in an energy-aware way. As suggested in RFC 3626, MPRs can be selected by their residual energy, rather than by their 2-hop neighborhood coverage (Ghanem et al, 2005). Some works applied both techniques (MPR selection criteria modification and path determination algorithm modification) to increase the energy efficiency of OLSR protocol (Benslimane et al, 2006;Kunz, 2008).…”
Section: Proactive Energy-aware Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calinescu et al [4] study an approach where the lifetime of the network is maximized taking into account the energy cost to maintain the topology. Closest to the problem studied in this paper is [7], where adjustments are made to the MPR selection algorithm to increase the network lifetime.…”
Section: Network Lifetime Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%