1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01438967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New enthalpy increment flow calorimeter and measurements on a mixture of 68% methane and 32% propane

Abstract: A new flow calorimeter Ibr measuring isobaric enthalphy increme.lt and JouleThomson efl~:ct was built :rod tested during the period 1987-1993. The calorirneter has several features that reduce the heat leakage better than previous designs: this includes thermal shields cooled by propane, a heat sink, and superinsulation on all piping. The temperature and pressure range covered by the calorimeter is 133 to 343 K and 0.17 to 14 MPa. Measurements on a mixture of 68.32'!/,, methane and 31.68 % propane are presente… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature values include the data of Yesavage, Mather, and Manker measured using a freon boil-off total enthalpy flow calorimeter with an estimated relative uncertainty of 3 %, and the data of Grini et al, measured using an electrically heated flow calorimeter with an estimated relative uncertainty of 0.22 % in the measured enthalpy increment. The relative difference between our results and those of Grini et al is less than 2 %, while the data of Yesavage, Mather, and Manker are within 3 % of our data, which is within the combined uncertainty of all of the measurements. The literature data for methane (1) + propane (3) have a relative scatter of about ± 3 % and are approximately centered on the predictions of GERG 2008 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature values include the data of Yesavage, Mather, and Manker measured using a freon boil-off total enthalpy flow calorimeter with an estimated relative uncertainty of 3 %, and the data of Grini et al, measured using an electrically heated flow calorimeter with an estimated relative uncertainty of 0.22 % in the measured enthalpy increment. The relative difference between our results and those of Grini et al is less than 2 %, while the data of Yesavage, Mather, and Manker are within 3 % of our data, which is within the combined uncertainty of all of the measurements. The literature data for methane (1) + propane (3) have a relative scatter of about ± 3 % and are approximately centered on the predictions of GERG 2008 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work: ■, x 1 = 0.82, p = 5.2 MPa; ◆, x 1 = 0.81, p = 6.0 MPa; ▲, x 1 = 0.81, p = 4.7 MPa. Literature: Mather: ×, x 1 = 0.88, p = 6.9 MPa; ○, x 1 = 0.88, p = 3.4 MPa; +, x 1 = 0.72, p = 6.9 MPa; □, x 1 = 0.95, p = 1.7 MPa; △, x 1 = 0.95, p = 5.2 MPa; Manker: ∗, x 1 = 0.95, p = 6.9 MPa; Yesavage: ◇, x 1 = 0.49, p = 6.9 MPa; Grini et al: □, x 1 = 0.68, p = 14 MPa. Calculated: - - -, PR-HYSYS, x 1 = 0.82, p = 5.2 MPa, – · −, PR-REFPROP, x 1 = 0.82, p = 5.2 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1,3) The test loop of the flow calorimeter when used for measurements on liquids is shown in the pressure against enthalpy diagram in figure 1. The measurements of interest are made in the isobaric heating section between points a and b in figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrically heated flow calorimeter used for the measurements has been described previously, (1,2) together with measurements on (0.68CH 4 + 0.32C 3 H 8 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%