2020
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaa208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Environment, New Invaders—Repeated Horizontal Transfer of LINEs to Sea Snakes

Abstract: While numerous studies have found horizontal transposon transfer (HTT) to be widespread across metazoans, few have focused on HTT in marine ecosystems. To investigate potential recent HTTs into marine species we searched for novel repetitive elements in sea snakes, a group of elapids which transitioned to a marine habitat at most 18 Mya. Our analysis uncovered repeated HTTs into sea snakes following their marine transition. The 7 subfamilies of horizontally transferred LINE retrotransposons we identified in th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All six primitive snake species compared ( Figure 2 ) were found to display a low abundance of CR1 and LTRs, which were higher than those in many species ( Deinagkistrodon acutus , Bothrops asper , Cerrophidion godmani , Sistrurus catenatus , Crotalus atrox , C. viridis ) of the advanced snake lineage. In addition, BovB is found at high abundance in the genome of the marine file snake ( Figure 2 ) ( Acrochordus granulatus ), which is indicative of HTT events as also reported by Galbraith et al [ 48 ] in several species of sea snake. This variability can contribute to genome diversification between primitive and advanced snakes, and even to variation in species-specific elements, thereby reshaping homomorphic or heterophonic sex chromosomes and karyotypic variability with different numbers of microchromosomes.…”
Section: Repeat Abundance In Snake Genomessupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All six primitive snake species compared ( Figure 2 ) were found to display a low abundance of CR1 and LTRs, which were higher than those in many species ( Deinagkistrodon acutus , Bothrops asper , Cerrophidion godmani , Sistrurus catenatus , Crotalus atrox , C. viridis ) of the advanced snake lineage. In addition, BovB is found at high abundance in the genome of the marine file snake ( Figure 2 ) ( Acrochordus granulatus ), which is indicative of HTT events as also reported by Galbraith et al [ 48 ] in several species of sea snake. This variability can contribute to genome diversification between primitive and advanced snakes, and even to variation in species-specific elements, thereby reshaping homomorphic or heterophonic sex chromosomes and karyotypic variability with different numbers of microchromosomes.…”
Section: Repeat Abundance In Snake Genomessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For example, the transcriptional activity of LINEs in amphibious elapids provides evidence that these elements may drive ecological adaptation in marine environments. Interestingly, active LINEs are exclusively present in sea snakes and are localized in the vicinity of “ADCY4”, a gene involved in circadian entrainment [ 48 ]. Several other genes involved in the functions of adaptive features (metabolism, development, limb loss, trunk elongation, and skeletal changes) have been detected with rapid and extremely variable transcriptional responses in multiple organ systems under different environments [ 12 , 13 , 22 , 226 ].…”
Section: Putative Impact Of Transposable Element Transcripts On the Evolutionary Dynamics Of Snakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CR1) and LTR retrotransposons (ERVs). For DNA transposons and LINEs, we first identified open reading frames (ORFs) in the insertions annotated by R epeat M asker , then translated such ORFs and aligned with RPS-BLAST [ 102 ] against a custom Pfam [ 103 ] database containing transposon-related proteins (similar approach to [ 104 ]). ORFs from LINEs of at least 600 bp that spanned 90% of both endonuclease and reverse transcriptase domains were considered as full-length elements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified fl-TEs in all the six avian genomes by adopting different methods for DNA transposons, LINEs (e.g., CR1), and LTR retrotransposons (ERVs). For DNA transposons and LINEs, we first identified open reading frames (ORFs) in the insertions annotated by RepeatMasker, then translated such ORFs and aligned with RPS-BLAST [103] against a custom Pfam [104] database containing transposon-related proteins (similar approach to [105]). ORFs from LINEs of at least 600 bp that spanned 90% of both endonuclease and reverse transcriptase domains were considered as full-length elements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%