1988
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/48.1.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New equations for estimating body fat mass in pregnancy from body density or total body water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
136
1
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
136
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed association appears biologically plausible because higher GWG, especially in early pregnancy, might reflect a greater accrual of fat mass [38,39], which may reduce the capacity to compensate for the physiological increase in insulin resistance that occurs in pregnancy [10,15]. This is further supported by recent findings on the regional distribution of adipose tissue gain in pregnancy: Sommer et al evaluated associations of weight gain, total fat gain and regional fat gain between 14 and 28 weeks of pregnancy with the development of GDM [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The observed association appears biologically plausible because higher GWG, especially in early pregnancy, might reflect a greater accrual of fat mass [38,39], which may reduce the capacity to compensate for the physiological increase in insulin resistance that occurs in pregnancy [10,15]. This is further supported by recent findings on the regional distribution of adipose tissue gain in pregnancy: Sommer et al evaluated associations of weight gain, total fat gain and regional fat gain between 14 and 28 weeks of pregnancy with the development of GDM [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The high water content of gained weight is reflected in the lower energy cost (4.7 to 6.4 kcal/g of weight gained) in comparison to the energy cost (8 kcal/g) for weight gain in non-pregnant women (Durnin, 1987;Hytten, 1980b;Forbes, 1988). As a consequence, the hydration of the FFM increases from about 72.5% at ten weeks of gestation to about 75% at 40 weeks, particularly in women with oedema (van Raaij et al, 1988), and there is a decrease in the ratio of intra-to extracellular water. Plasma volume expansion is hormonally induced, maximal during the second trimester (plus 50%), and accompanied by a lowered set-point of plasma osmolarity (minus about 10 mosm/L) and a fall in plasma sodium and associated anions.…”
Section: Total Body Water and Its Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Também a geometria corporal se altera, afetando uma das premissas do cálculo da resistência e reactância, que é o diâmetro do corpo atravessado pela corrente 1 . Outros enfatizam que o glicogênio tecidual tende a se depletar no final da gestação, com concomitante perda de água celular, resultando em mudança da densidade da massa magra e falhas na estimação dela 13 . Diante de todas estas incertezas, Lukaski et al 1 optaram por estudar a água corporal na gravidez com base em equação própria, obtida por regressão linear múltipla não somente das medidas usuais de resistência, peso e altura, mas levando em conta, também, a reactância, circunferência abdominal e hematócrito.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Os excessos hídricos do feto são reais, mas a contrapartida é o ganho de gordura (90% materna 14 ), quase anidra, resultando numa parcela aquosa média de 50%, análoga à dos tecidos maternos pré-gravídicos, de sorte a, praticamente, não modificar as leituras de bioimpedância. Tal suposição encontra respaldo nos resultados da equação de Lukaski et al 1 , assim como, com poucas ressalvas, de outros grupos experientes 13 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified