1971
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1971.10482221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Estimators of Disturbances in Regression Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposition parallels a related result of Abrahamse and Koerts (1971). For completeness, we also sketch the derivation of (3.6) directly from (2.7) and (2.9) which is not without interest.…”
Section: The Class Of Uncorrelated Residual Transformationssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The proposition parallels a related result of Abrahamse and Koerts (1971). For completeness, we also sketch the derivation of (3.6) directly from (2.7) and (2.9) which is not without interest.…”
Section: The Class Of Uncorrelated Residual Transformationssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…When testing against heteroskedasticity, choose the middle k observations; when testing against first-order autocorrelation, choose the first k observations or the last k or a mixture of the two. Improvements and extensions of Theil's work on BLUS residuals can be found in Koerts (1967), Putter (1967), Koerts and Abrahamse (1968), Abrahamse and Koerts (1971) and others.…”
Section: Definition 1: Consider the Linear Regression Model Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2] such a typical matrix x, say, was adopted for the economic time-series case. It appeared that by using the new residual vector, based on 8, the greater part of the power lost is regained.…”
Section: Some Lossof Quality Must Be Expected Since An Extra Restrictmentioning
confidence: 99%