2021
DOI: 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00594-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New evaluated data on $$^{{{206,207,208}}}$$Pb photodisintegration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been extensively investigated through photonuclear reactions [3,4] as well as through inelastic hadron scattering experiments [5][6][7][8]. However, there are unresolved systematic discrepancies [9] between the total and partial (γ,n) and (γ,2n) photoneutron cross sections obtained at the Saclay and Livermore positron in flight annihilation facilities: the Saclay results [3] for the (γ,abs) and (γ,n) cross sections are systematically higher than the Livermore ones [4], while Livermore (γ,2n) cross sections overestimate the Saclay ones. We note that the evaluations adopted in the 1999 and 2019 IAEA Photonuclear Data Libraries [10] follow the recommendation of Berman et al [11] of lowering the Saclay data by 7% and increasing the Livermore results by 22%, although a single renormalization factor fails to simultaneously solve the inconsistencies for both the (γ,n) and (γ,2n) channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been extensively investigated through photonuclear reactions [3,4] as well as through inelastic hadron scattering experiments [5][6][7][8]. However, there are unresolved systematic discrepancies [9] between the total and partial (γ,n) and (γ,2n) photoneutron cross sections obtained at the Saclay and Livermore positron in flight annihilation facilities: the Saclay results [3] for the (γ,abs) and (γ,n) cross sections are systematically higher than the Livermore ones [4], while Livermore (γ,2n) cross sections overestimate the Saclay ones. We note that the evaluations adopted in the 1999 and 2019 IAEA Photonuclear Data Libraries [10] follow the recommendation of Berman et al [11] of lowering the Saclay data by 7% and increasing the Livermore results by 22%, although a single renormalization factor fails to simultaneously solve the inconsistencies for both the (γ,n) and (γ,2n) channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%