2016
DOI: 10.4258/hir.2016.22.3.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Evaluation Vector through the Stanford Mobile Inquiry-Based Learning Environment (SMILE) for Participatory Action Research

Abstract: ObjectivesThis article reviews an evaluation vector model driven from a participatory action research leveraging a collective inquiry system named SMILE (Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment).MethodsSMILE has been implemented in a diverse set of collective inquiry generation and analysis scenarios including community health care-specific professional development sessions and community-based participatory action research projects. In each scenario, participants are given opportunities to construct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows that seven aims of co-creation were identified. The most widely represented was ‘to validate or enable more reliable research’ (62%), 1 , 4 , 5 , 19 , 20 , 24 , 26–30 , 33 , 35 , 37–39 , 43–45 , 47 , 49–52 , 54–57 , 59 , 60 , 62 including to reduce dropout rates or increase participants’ engagement and make long-term goals more sustainable. The most common process element was to ‘focus on equality, empowerment and measures of power-sharing’ (54%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows that seven aims of co-creation were identified. The most widely represented was ‘to validate or enable more reliable research’ (62%), 1 , 4 , 5 , 19 , 20 , 24 , 26–30 , 33 , 35 , 37–39 , 43–45 , 47 , 49–52 , 54–57 , 59 , 60 , 62 including to reduce dropout rates or increase participants’ engagement and make long-term goals more sustainable. The most common process element was to ‘focus on equality, empowerment and measures of power-sharing’ (54%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El diseño tecnopedagógico que se presenta, se apoya en lo tecnológico en una mediación para montar el andamiaje, (Badia y García, 2006), la plataforma Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment SMILE, (Kim, 2009;Kim, 2016;Acosta et al, 2014;Aarón, 2019), (Figura 1) que es una plataforma tecnológica diseñada como entorno de aprendizaje basado en la indagación (Suárez, et al, 2018) (Lee, 2012). Esta herramienta tecnológica soporta la ruta pedagógica diseñada para favorecer la acción pedagógica.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified