1989
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.1989.sp003259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Evidence That L‐glutamate Is a Transmitter at the Squid Giant Synapse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L-Glutamate is the strongest candidate, since transmission at the synapse is reversibly inhibited by several specific blockers of glutamate receptors in other systems (DeSantis & Messenger, 1989). However, attempts to mimic transmission by close postsynaptic iontophoresis or bath application of glutamate or glutamate receptor agonists fail to discharge postsynaptic action potentials and only result in slow, weak depolarizations (Miledi, 1967;DeSantis, Eusebi & Miledi, 1975;Adams & Gillespie, 1988; DeSantis & Messenger, 1989). The giant synapse is a complex structure (Young, 1973) with numerous postsynaptic processes penetrating a tight sheath to make about 15000 functional contacts with the presynaptic fibre (Martin & Miledi, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L-Glutamate is the strongest candidate, since transmission at the synapse is reversibly inhibited by several specific blockers of glutamate receptors in other systems (DeSantis & Messenger, 1989). However, attempts to mimic transmission by close postsynaptic iontophoresis or bath application of glutamate or glutamate receptor agonists fail to discharge postsynaptic action potentials and only result in slow, weak depolarizations (Miledi, 1967;DeSantis, Eusebi & Miledi, 1975;Adams & Gillespie, 1988; DeSantis & Messenger, 1989). The giant synapse is a complex structure (Young, 1973) with numerous postsynaptic processes penetrating a tight sheath to make about 15000 functional contacts with the presynaptic fibre (Martin & Miledi, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4b) (P = 0.268). The failure of an EC 50 dose of Glu to affect the firing might be due to a marked diffusion barrier across the isolated ganglion and/or to the rapid neurotransmitter removal from the extracellular space (De Santis and Messenger 1989). This result suggests that Glu elicits the bursting activity of RPeD1 under our experimental conditions.…”
Section: Gaba Hyperpolarizes Rped1 By Activating Gaba a Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Therefore, the electrophysiological effects of such agonists on the whole respiratory circuit were investigated and compared with those exerted by Glu. We reasoned that, if any of AMPA-and kainate-sensitive receptors mediated the respiratory discharge, addition of selective agonists to the perfusate could lead to inhibition of firing by receptor desensitization (Adams and Gillespie 1988;De Santis and Messenger 1989;Nesic et al 1996).…”
Section: Gaba Hyperpolarizes Rped1 By Activating Gaba a Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in the squid giant synapse, the postsynaptic response is mediated by an ␣-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-like receptor (Fig. 6), but the molecular identification of this receptor is absent (42). Moreover, since some characteristics of invertebrate glutamate receptors, such as chloride conductance (43), are not retained by their vertebrate counterparts, it is probable that the modulation produced by NGF of squid giant synapse involves target(s) not yet identified in vertebrates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%