2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-020-01818-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Examples on Lavrentiev Gap Using Fractals

Abstract: Zhikov showed 1986 with his famous checkerboard example that functionals with variable exponents can have a Lavrentiev gap. For this example it was crucial that the exponent had a saddle point whose value was exactly the dimension. In 1997 he extended this example to the setting of the double phase potential. Again it was important that the exponents crosses the dimensional threshold. Therefore, it was conjectured that the dimensional threshold plays an important role for the Lavrentiev gap. We show that this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further examples involve fractal contact sets [BDS20] or matrix-valued integrands [FHM03]. The latter example was already treated numerically in [Ort11].…”
Section: Examples On Lavrentiev Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further examples involve fractal contact sets [BDS20] or matrix-valued integrands [FHM03]. The latter example was already treated numerically in [Ort11].…”
Section: Examples On Lavrentiev Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For n ≥ 2 counterexamples to W 1,q regularity with 1 < p < n < n + α < q are due to [19], see also [24]. Recent work suggests that the condition p < n < q may be removed [3]. If q < (n+α) p n , it was proven in [19] for many standard examples that minimisers enjoy W 1,q loc regularity.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is straightforward to adapt the arguments of Theorem 7 to to growth conditions that combine (H1.1) and (H1.2):+ |z i | 2 + |w i | 2 p i (x)−2 2 |z i − w i | 2 ≤ F(x, z) − F(z, w) − ∂ z F(x, w) • (z − w)where z i = (z i ) j 1≤ j≤n , w i = (w i ) j 1≤ j≤n and 1 < p ≤ p i (x) ≤ q. (H1 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For n ≥ 2 counterexamples to W 1,q regularity with 1 < p < n < n + α < q are due to [19], see also [24]. Recent work suggests that the condition p < n < q may be removed [3]. If q < (n+α)p n , it was proven in [19] for many standard examples that minimisers enjoy W 1,q loc regularity.…”
Section: Nmentioning
confidence: 99%