1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2426(199907)15:4<521::aid-num7>3.3.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New explicit finite difference schemes for two‐dimensional diffusion subject to specification of mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which proves (7). From the properties of modi ed generalized Laguerre polynomials, it can be easily shown that,…”
Section: Some Properties Of Modi Ed Generalized Laguerre Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which proves (7). From the properties of modi ed generalized Laguerre polynomials, it can be easily shown that,…”
Section: Some Properties Of Modi Ed Generalized Laguerre Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Many di erential models in various research disciplines such as mathematics, uid dynamics, chemistry, biology, viscoelasticity, engineering and physics have arisen in semi-in nite domains [6][7][8][9][10]. Consequently, a lot of researchers have utilized various transformations on classical orthogonal polynomials to map the bounded interval [− , ] into [ , L] and [ , ∞) maintaining their orthogonal property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 From the table above, it could also be observed that the Method shows high computational strength as it compares favourably well with some known standard methods reported. 2 The superiority of the proposed methods could be established in the table above. From the table above, it could also be From table 6 above, it could also be observed that the Method shows some superiority in-terms of accuracy when compared with the method of Wang et al [11] and also compares favourably 3 (x, t) is the coordinate of x and t, u(x, t) is the exact solution, UM is the Upwind method, LM is the Lax method, Method represents the solution using the Method and Relative error=| u(x, t) -Method |/u(x, t).…”
Section: Tables Of Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most popular techniques applied to the solution of Advection equation is finite difference method [1,2]. In recent times, the finite element and the finite volume methods were also introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear problems play important roles in fluid mechanics and heat transfer. Except for a limited number of these problems, most of them do not have precise analytical solutions; therefore, these nonlinear equations should be solved using approximate semi-analytical and numerical solutions, such as the Adomian’s decomposition method (Sheikholeslami et al , 2013), difference transformation method (Sheikholeslami et al , 2016), homotopy perturbation method (Sheikholeslami and Ganji, 2014), exp-function method (Parand and Rad, 2012), control volume-based finite element method (Sheikholeslami et al , 2015; Sheikholeslami and Seyednezhad, 2018), finite difference method (Noye and Dehghan, 1999), finite element method (Bu et al , 2015; Sheikholeslami, 2017), meshfree methods (Rad et al , 2015a, 2015b) and spectral methods (Parand et al , 2013a, 2013b). Spectral methods have been successfully applied in the approximation of differential boundary value problems defined in semi-infinite domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%