New Firms Evolving in the Knowledge Economy: Problems and Solutions Around Turning Points

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in Abstract:This paper explores and explains the emergence and growth of new firms in the knowledge economy. The resource-based view, capabilities approach, and evolutionary economics are used as a foundation for a developmental approach. The development of the firm is conceptualized in terms of processes that include opportunity recognition, resource mobilization, resource generation and resource accumulation, which lead to the development of competences and capital in a base made up of productive, commercial and financial resources. Problems originating within or outside the firm may deplete the productive, commercial and asset base, leading to turning points in the life course of these firms. These have negative consequences when problems are not solved, but positive consequences when they lead to new solutions and the development of new competence. The empirical study shows that even in an elite sample of young fast-growing firms, most firms face turning points in their life course, and thus do not grow in a continuous way. The study shows that quantitative growth indicators do not always reveal growth problems that have been faced by new firms. Some problems do not negatively affect the employment growth of the firm, and other problems are solved before growth stagnates. The qualitative analysis shows that young firms are almost always in disequilibrium: there is almost never a perfect match between the constituents of their resource base, between input resources and requirements for expansion. This explains why continuous growth is so unlikely. Although every firm seems to grow in a unique manner, there is evidence for the presence of a limited set of necessary mechanisms for the growth of (new) firms, which work out in particular ways given the specific context and history of these firms.

A taxonomy of the early growth of Belgian start‐ups

“…Our results confirm that a cross-sectional approach can fail to capture the complex reality of the evolving new firm. They support the recent studies based on longitudinal approaches such as those of Delmar et al (2003), Garnsey et al (2006), Garnsey and Heffernan (2005), Mustar (2002), McMahon (2001) and Stam and Garnsey (2006).…”

Tax compliance over the firm life course

“…Although the literature on stages of growth models provides useful insights into how firms might change during their life course, there is no consensus on how many stages there are, on the necessary sequences or on the dominant problems at turning points (see Stam and Garnsey, 2006). There is also no empirical evidence on the universal applicability of these models (see Garnsey et al, 2006;Phelps et al, 2007;Levie and Lichtenstein, 2010).…”

Finance, Innovation and Emerging Industries – A Review

“…Nonetheless new firms are associated with a variety of generating processes (Stam and Garnsey 2005) that are an essential part of change, as identified in evolutionary studies (Metcalfe 1998).…”