Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
To meet rising global demands for energy, the oil and gas industry continuously strives to develop innovative oilfield technologies. With the development of new enhanced oil recovery techniques, sandstone acidizing has been significantly developed to contribute to the petroleum industry. Different acid combinations have been applied to the formation, which result in minimizing the near wellbore damage and improving the well productivity. A combination of hydrofluoric acid and hydrochloric acid (HF:HCl) known as mud acid has gained attractiveness in improving the porosity and permeability of the reservoir formation. However, high-temperature matrix acidizing is now growing since most of the wells nowadays become deeper and hotter temperature reservoirs, with a temperature higher than 200°F. As a result, mud acid becomes corrosive, forms precipitates and reacts rapidly, which causes early consumption of acid, hence becoming less efficient due to high pH value. However, different acids have been developed to combat these problems where studies on retarded mud acids, organic-HF acids, emulsified acids, chelating agents have shown their effectiveness at different conditions. These acids proved to be alternative to mud acid in sandstone acidizing, but the reaction mechanism and experimental analysis have not yet been investigated. The paper critically reviews the sandstone acidizing mechanism with different acids, problems occurred during the application of different acids and explores the reasons when matrix stimulation is successful over fracturing. This paper also explores the future developing requirement for matrix acidizing treatments and new experimental techniques that can be useful for further development, particularly in developing new acids and acidizing techniques, which would provide better results and information of topology, morphology and mineral dissolution and the challenges associated with implementing these ''new'' technologies.
To meet rising global demands for energy, the oil and gas industry continuously strives to develop innovative oilfield technologies. With the development of new enhanced oil recovery techniques, sandstone acidizing has been significantly developed to contribute to the petroleum industry. Different acid combinations have been applied to the formation, which result in minimizing the near wellbore damage and improving the well productivity. A combination of hydrofluoric acid and hydrochloric acid (HF:HCl) known as mud acid has gained attractiveness in improving the porosity and permeability of the reservoir formation. However, high-temperature matrix acidizing is now growing since most of the wells nowadays become deeper and hotter temperature reservoirs, with a temperature higher than 200°F. As a result, mud acid becomes corrosive, forms precipitates and reacts rapidly, which causes early consumption of acid, hence becoming less efficient due to high pH value. However, different acids have been developed to combat these problems where studies on retarded mud acids, organic-HF acids, emulsified acids, chelating agents have shown their effectiveness at different conditions. These acids proved to be alternative to mud acid in sandstone acidizing, but the reaction mechanism and experimental analysis have not yet been investigated. The paper critically reviews the sandstone acidizing mechanism with different acids, problems occurred during the application of different acids and explores the reasons when matrix stimulation is successful over fracturing. This paper also explores the future developing requirement for matrix acidizing treatments and new experimental techniques that can be useful for further development, particularly in developing new acids and acidizing techniques, which would provide better results and information of topology, morphology and mineral dissolution and the challenges associated with implementing these ''new'' technologies.
Since the mid-1990s the use of HCl/HF at a weight ratio of 9 to 1 has been used extensively in field operations to minimize precipitation during sandstone acidizing. Although it was perceived as applying to all secondary reactions, it was originally directed at fluosilicates. Field case histories have been reported to support this recommendation. However, little evidence is available to justify the use of 9 wt% HCl - 1 wt% HF (9–1 mud acid) at the 300°F temperature exhibited in the Jauf reservoir. Thus, a laboratory study incorporating HF systems with various HCl to HF ratios was performed to quantify the amount of precipitation in Jauf reservoir cores at 300°F, and the impact on permeability. The focus of this paper is on the silicon (Si) and aluminum (Al) concentrations in core flow test effluents that were corrected for post-core test precipitation of reaction products in collection tubes. This technique accounts for the Si and Al in the liquid and solid phases of core flow effluents. The literature teaches that the Si/Al molar ratio of a core test effluent can be used as a diagnostic tool to quantify hydrated silica formation. It is assumed that hydrated silica precipitation increases as the Si/Al ratio decreases from the theoretical value as a result of a greater completion of the secondary and tertiary reactions of HF with silt and clays. The results of this study on short Jauf reservoir and Berea cores at 300°F indicate that cores treated with 9 wt% HCl - 1 wt% HF yield a lower Si/Al ratio than observed with 12 wt% HCl - 3 wt% HF. However, cores treated with 4 wt% HCl - 1 wt% HF yield the lowest Si/Al ratio. The Si/Al ratio is not the only diagnostic tool required to determine the amount of hydrated silica precipitation i.e. factors including the mud acid flow pattern (matrix vs. channel) have a significant impact on the Si/Al ratio. Core flow test results are presented for acetic acid preflush followed by various mud acid systems. All cores were stimulated, although hydrated silica formed in all core tests and aluminum fluoride precipitated in core tests using 4–1 mud acid formulations at 300°F. Introduction Sandstone matrix acidizing has been applied in oil, gas and injection wells for decades to remove formation damage in the critical area surrounding the wellbore.1,2 The chemical reactions that occur between HF acid systems and the aluminosilicate minerals in sandstone reservoirs have been investigated in detail. It is obvious that the sandstone matrix process is significantly more complex than carbonate acidizing. Unlike carbonate acidizing where the formation damage is simply bypassed via the creation of wormholes, during sandstone acidizing the damage that is plugging the pores normally must be dissolved. Subsequent reactions must not occur that create formation damage i.e. precipitation of calcium fluoride (CaF2) or potassium fluosilicate.3–5 Formation of insoluble reaction products during carbonate acidizing using hydrochloric acid (HCl) is rare, but it occurs in every sandstone acid treatment incorporating an HF acid system i.e. hydrated silica.6–7 The focus of this paper is on the formation of hydrated silica as a function of the HCl to HF ratio in mud acid systems, and its impact on formation damage. Hydrated silica, Si(OH)4, is formed during the secondary and tertiary reactions of HF with feldspar and clay as shown in Equations 1 and 2, respectively.4–9 Secondary Reaction: Equation 1 Silica gel, aluminum fluoride complexes (AlFx(3-x)+, and potassium (K) cations are formed during the secondary reaction (Equation 1) via the reaction of pentafluosilicic acid with feldspar/clay. This reaction goes to completion in most sandstone acidizing treatments before well flowback occurs.4,6,7 Secondary Reaction:Equation 1 Silica gel, aluminum fluoride complexes (AlFx(3-x)+, and potassium (K) cations are formed during the secondary reaction (Equation 1) via the reaction of pentafluosilicic acid with feldspar/clay. This reaction goes to completion in most sandstone acidizing treatments before well flowback occurs.4,6,7
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.