2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00455-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New forensic approach to age determination in children based on tooth eruption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have been done using Demirjian et al, method in several populations and consistent overestimation [2,3,8,[19][20][21][22] and underestimation [23] in dental age was observed. Similarly Willems method also showed significant overestimation [24,25], and underestimation [26], Nolla's method also showed overestimation in young children [27][28][29][30][31], and underestimation [32] and significant difference in one sex [33,34] in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been done using Demirjian et al, method in several populations and consistent overestimation [2,3,8,[19][20][21][22] and underestimation [23] in dental age was observed. Similarly Willems method also showed significant overestimation [24,25], and underestimation [26], Nolla's method also showed overestimation in young children [27][28][29][30][31], and underestimation [32] and significant difference in one sex [33,34] in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these studies have demonstrated that the Demirjian method overestimated age between 0.04 years (12) to 3.04 years (1). According to the opinion of the authors, this advancement in dental maturation may be partly explained by the positive secular trend in growth and development observed during the last 35 years (6,8,13,14,(26)(27)(28). Other differences between the populations can be explained by environmental factors such as socio-economic status, nutrition, dietary habits and lifestyle (1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H o w e v e r , a l t h o u g h t h i s m e t h o d i s f a s t , c h e a p a n d n o t v e r y i n f l u e n c e d b y i n t r a -a n d interobserver error, eruption is not a good age indicator when used alone, due to factors like interindividual or populational variation (Garn et al, 1959;Moorees et al, 1963), systemic or local diseases (Ungar, 1937) or the elapsed time without changes (Teivens & Mörnstad, 2001). Numerous authors have investigated the chronology and sequence of eruption in different populations (Foti et al, 2003;Fulton & Price, 1954;Giles et al, 1963;Logan & Kronfield, 1933;Olze et al, 2007;Planells et al, 1993;Saunders et al 1993;Tanguay et al 1984; Van der Linden, 1980). Some of this research examines the correlation between dental eruption and other development parameters; for example Lewis and Garn (Garn & Lewis, 1959) which evaluates parameters such as somatic and sexual growth, personality and state of health, or Green (Green, 1961) which attempts to establish correlations between dental, skeletal and chronological age and weight and height, finding a stronger correlation between dental and chronological age even than that existing between dental and bone development.…”
Section: Dental Eruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%