“…H o w e v e r , a l t h o u g h t h i s m e t h o d i s f a s t , c h e a p a n d n o t v e r y i n f l u e n c e d b y i n t r a -a n d interobserver error, eruption is not a good age indicator when used alone, due to factors like interindividual or populational variation (Garn et al, 1959;Moorees et al, 1963), systemic or local diseases (Ungar, 1937) or the elapsed time without changes (Teivens & Mörnstad, 2001). Numerous authors have investigated the chronology and sequence of eruption in different populations (Foti et al, 2003;Fulton & Price, 1954;Giles et al, 1963;Logan & Kronfield, 1933;Olze et al, 2007;Planells et al, 1993;Saunders et al 1993;Tanguay et al 1984; Van der Linden, 1980). Some of this research examines the correlation between dental eruption and other development parameters; for example Lewis and Garn (Garn & Lewis, 1959) which evaluates parameters such as somatic and sexual growth, personality and state of health, or Green (Green, 1961) which attempts to establish correlations between dental, skeletal and chronological age and weight and height, finding a stronger correlation between dental and chronological age even than that existing between dental and bone development.…”