2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40299-016-0306-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Form of National Language Policy? The Case of the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies by Otomo (2016) and Nunoo (2012) both discuss Japanese language education policy for EPA trainees, similar to the current study, but do so from the perspective of policy paper level. Nevertheless, Nunoo's argument is indicative as it leads to further discussion regarding if the EPA scheme can serve as a test case of future immigration policy in Japan.…”
Section: Studies On the Epasupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies by Otomo (2016) and Nunoo (2012) both discuss Japanese language education policy for EPA trainees, similar to the current study, but do so from the perspective of policy paper level. Nevertheless, Nunoo's argument is indicative as it leads to further discussion regarding if the EPA scheme can serve as a test case of future immigration policy in Japan.…”
Section: Studies On the Epasupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Some studies (such as the current study) have also investigated the EPA scheme from the perspective of immigration policy in the field of LPP. For example, Otomo (2016) analysed EPA policy documents and revealed the trivial treatment and examples of ambiguous language in the documents. She calls for greater importance to be placed on the LPP perspective when considering the EPA scheme as, despite their significance, language issues are likely to be overlooked due to being embedded in emerging forms of immigration policies.…”
Section: Studies On the Epamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining the current policy discussions from the point of view of applied linguists, Hashimoto (2018), Nunoo (2016), and Otomo (2016) all point out the lack of attention to, and understanding of, the multifaceted nature of Japanese language learning and teaching on the part of policymakers. There are differences among language necessary for managing everyday life in Japan, language necessary for engaging in professional activities, and language necessary for passing high‐stake exams designed for different purposes.…”
Section: Linguistic Penalty or Appreciation Of Skilled Human Resources?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After working in Japan for 3 years, they become eligible to take the national certification exam, but the exam, only offered in Japanese, has been considered a major hurdle for these foreign workers because it tends to evaluate skills and knowledge highly embedded in local language and culture (Lan, 2016, 2018; Shinohara, 2016). A growing number of studies (Hashimoto, 2018; Kusunoki, 2018; Nunoo, 2016; Otomo, 2016) have critically examined the language ideologies and policies behind the scheme of the EPA program through the analysis of government documents, media discourse, and results of questionnaires and interviews with various stakeholders. However, few studies have investigated actual workplace activities in which these foreign care workers have taken part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation