2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New formulation of nonlinear kinematic hardening model, Part I: A Dirac delta function approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous work [4, 9], the hardening ratio ρh$\rho _{h}$ is assumed to be constant (kh=1$k_{h}=1$) during the whole cyclic loading process. However, some researchers [5, 10, 11] indicated that the hardening rate changes significantly after shear reverse loading condition. Compared to the multi‐surfaces [10] and multi‐kinematic‐hardening‐parameters approach [11], the most straightforward effective hardening function khbadbreak={0forγ0.05andγ<γ1e60(γ0.05)badbreak+(10γ0.5)e6for0.05<γ0.15andγ<γ1for0.15<γ<γorγγ0.16em.$$\begin{equation} k_{h}={\left\lbrace \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{llccccc} 0 &\,\mbox{for}\, & \gamma ^{*} \le 0.05&\mbox{and}\, & \gamma ^{*}&lt;\gamma \\[3pt] 1-e^{-60(\gamma ^{*}-0.05)}{+(10\gamma ^{*}-0.5)e^{-6}}&\,\mbox{for}\, & 0.05&lt;\gamma ^{*} \le 0.15&\mbox{and}\, & \gamma ^{*}&lt;\gamma \\[3pt] 1 &\,\mbox{for}\, & 0.15&lt;\gamma ^{*} &lt;\gamma &\mbox{or} \, &\gamma ^{*}\ge \gamma \end{array} \right.}\,.…”
Section: Constitutive Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the previous work [4, 9], the hardening ratio ρh$\rho _{h}$ is assumed to be constant (kh=1$k_{h}=1$) during the whole cyclic loading process. However, some researchers [5, 10, 11] indicated that the hardening rate changes significantly after shear reverse loading condition. Compared to the multi‐surfaces [10] and multi‐kinematic‐hardening‐parameters approach [11], the most straightforward effective hardening function khbadbreak={0forγ0.05andγ<γ1e60(γ0.05)badbreak+(10γ0.5)e6for0.05<γ0.15andγ<γ1for0.15<γ<γorγγ0.16em.$$\begin{equation} k_{h}={\left\lbrace \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{llccccc} 0 &\,\mbox{for}\, & \gamma ^{*} \le 0.05&\mbox{and}\, & \gamma ^{*}&lt;\gamma \\[3pt] 1-e^{-60(\gamma ^{*}-0.05)}{+(10\gamma ^{*}-0.5)e^{-6}}&\,\mbox{for}\, & 0.05&lt;\gamma ^{*} \le 0.15&\mbox{and}\, & \gamma ^{*}&lt;\gamma \\[3pt] 1 &\,\mbox{for}\, & 0.15&lt;\gamma ^{*} &lt;\gamma &\mbox{or} \, &\gamma ^{*}\ge \gamma \end{array} \right.}\,.…”
Section: Constitutive Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous work [4,9], the hardening ratio 𝜌 ℎ is assumed to be constant (𝑘 ℎ = 1) during the whole cyclic loading process. However, some researchers [5,10,11] indicated that the hardening rate changes significantly after shear reverse loading condition. Compared to the multi-surfaces [10] and multi-kinematic-hardeningparameters approach [11], the most straightforward effective hardening function…”
Section: Constitutive Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%