2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Geant4 cross section models for PIXE simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This set covers the 0.1-100 MeV range for K and L shells, and the 0.1-10 MeV range for M shells. The third set, named ''ECPSSR_Analytical'', is based on an in-house implementation of the ECPSSR theory proposed by Ben Abdelouahed for the description of K and L shells ionisation for incident protons (see more details in [3,21]) and it has a larger energy range applicability. It is used by default out of the energy boundaries of the other sets.…”
Section: Simulation Of Pixe Using Geant4 Electromagnetic Physics Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This set covers the 0.1-100 MeV range for K and L shells, and the 0.1-10 MeV range for M shells. The third set, named ''ECPSSR_Analytical'', is based on an in-house implementation of the ECPSSR theory proposed by Ben Abdelouahed for the description of K and L shells ionisation for incident protons (see more details in [3,21]) and it has a larger energy range applicability. It is used by default out of the energy boundaries of the other sets.…”
Section: Simulation Of Pixe Using Geant4 Electromagnetic Physics Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this model does not deliver the desired results, which affects the possibility to use it. To address the problem, in 2008 a new extension from the thesis work of Ben Abdelouahed23, 24 has been proposed in order to calculate proton and alpha K‐shell ionisation cross‐sections according to the ECPSSR theory25, 26 and L i ‐shells ionisation cross‐sections according to an empirical model from Orlic et al 27, 28 The models proposed in Refs 23,24 were suited for the low‐energy regime and their full availability for Geant4 user applications was still at a beta version as underlined in Ref 29.…”
Section: Status Of Pixe Simulation In Geant4 Em Subpackagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As explained in Ref 24, the ECPSSR theory is nowadays the most acknowledged theory by the scientific community able to reproduce shell ionisation cross‐section values. Consequently, ECPSSR has been considered to be the best choice for K‐ and L i ‐shell cross‐sectional calculations in Geant4.…”
Section: K‐ and Li‐shell Ionisation Cross‐sectional Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 12 comparisons are performed for a large set of sample materials spanning a broad range of 13 atomic numbers. The two alternative PIXE cross sections approaches (Geant4 and ANSTO) have 14 been compared to existing experimental measurements performed at ANSTO with gold, 15 tantalum and cerium targets of interest for nanomedicine applications. The results show that, 16 while the alternative approaches produce equivalent results for vacancies generated in the K 17 and L shell, differences are evident in the case of M shell vacancies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%