Metals for Biomedical Devices 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-102666-3.00019-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New-generation metallic biomaterials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, this term has been applied for multiprincipal element alloys that have been considered for applications in the biomedical field. The challenge is to overcome the limitations of conventional alloys (cp-Ti, Ti6Al4V, 316L, and CoCrMo alloys), and some promising results were reported concerning superior or similar corrosion resistance and implant degradation in a physiological environment [12][13][14], mechanical performance combined with biocompatibility [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], ion release [21,22], magnetic susceptibility [23,24], wear resistance [12,25], and bacterial infection [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since then, this term has been applied for multiprincipal element alloys that have been considered for applications in the biomedical field. The challenge is to overcome the limitations of conventional alloys (cp-Ti, Ti6Al4V, 316L, and CoCrMo alloys), and some promising results were reported concerning superior or similar corrosion resistance and implant degradation in a physiological environment [12][13][14], mechanical performance combined with biocompatibility [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], ion release [21,22], magnetic susceptibility [23,24], wear resistance [12,25], and bacterial infection [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 presents some mechanical properties of bone and conventional alloys. Cortical bone 10-30 [17,29] -100-200 [29] cp-Ti 90-110 [17] 120-200 [30] 170-310 1 [31] >240 [31] Ti6Al4V 100-110 [28] 310 [30] 850-900 [32] 860 [32] 316L 200 [29] 130-160 [33] 200-700 [29] 480-1000 [30] CoCrMo alloy 240 [29] 298 [33] 450-1500 [29] 655-1192 [32] 1 Grade 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implantable biomedical devices often promote fibrous tissue encapsulation on the material-tissue interface. These adverse tissue responses are a critical consideration for the success and optimal integration of long-term implants [13][14][15] . Material surfaces that present biomimetic morphology like nanotube and nanofibers that provides nanoscale architectures have been shown to alter cell/biomaterial interactions 16 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, biodegradable iron alloys, particularly the Fe-Mn-based system, have been considered an alternative to conventional biomedical alloys based on titanium, cobalt, stainless steels, and other metallic materials used in dentistry, orthopedics, and surgery [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. These materials combine the necessary functional properties (high mechanical properties and appropriate in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility) and, in contrast to traditional alloys, exhibit the ability to self-dissolve in the osteogenesis process [5,[9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%