2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2009.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New geochronological constraints on the geological evolution of Espinhaço basin within the São Francisco Craton—Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
0
21

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
74
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…975 Ma and therefore coeval to Rio Preto Group, can be viewed as correlative of the pre-glacial lower Macaúbas Group (Duas Barras and Peixe Bravo formations) exposed in Araçuaí Belt (Pedrosa-Soares et al 2001). Our data also supports Schobbenhaus (1996) suggestion that Santo Onofre and Rio Preto Groups were deposited in a NS-trending rift system, the Macaúbas -Santo Onofre -Rio Preto System, as also emphasized by Danderfer et al (2009) and Caxito et al (2014a).…”
Section: Stratigraphic Correlations and Implications For Evolution Ofsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…975 Ma and therefore coeval to Rio Preto Group, can be viewed as correlative of the pre-glacial lower Macaúbas Group (Duas Barras and Peixe Bravo formations) exposed in Araçuaí Belt (Pedrosa-Soares et al 2001). Our data also supports Schobbenhaus (1996) suggestion that Santo Onofre and Rio Preto Groups were deposited in a NS-trending rift system, the Macaúbas -Santo Onofre -Rio Preto System, as also emphasized by Danderfer et al (2009) and Caxito et al (2014a).…”
Section: Stratigraphic Correlations and Implications For Evolution Ofsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…1). The single 833 Ma concordant zircon found in the sample, although statistically not representative, is compatible with ages obtained in dykes occurring in the northern Espihanço Range (Danderfer et al 2009). Samples of Canabravinha and Formosa Formations showed a very similar provenance record: a youngest peak of Tonian age, minor Mesoproterozoic peaks, a major age concentration between 1.9 and 2.1 Ga, and minor contribution of Neo-Mesoarchean sources.…”
Section: Possible Source Areassupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several mafic dikes and sills were found in the northern Espinhaço, but none intruded the Sítio Novo and Santo Onofre successions. Danderfer et al (2009) reported one mafic dyke with an age of 854 ± 23 Ma (U-Pb SHRIMP), and suggested that this dike was related to the Santo Onofre rifting. Danderfer and Dardenne (2002) subdivided Santo Onofre Group into three formations, which were laterally and vertically complexly interdigitated and had distinct lithofacies successions (from the base to the top): the Canatiba Formation (carbonaceous, laminated and massive mudstones), Boqueirão Formation (sandstones with minor carbonaceous, laminated and massive mudstones), and João Dias Formation (mainly conglomerates and breccias with minor sandstones and mudstones).…”
Section: Northern Espinhaçomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Several unconformity-bounded stratigraphic successions have been characterized along southern and central Espinhaço regions and within the Paramirim aulacogen (Schobbenhaus 1996, Danderfer & Dardenne 2002, Chemale Jr. et al 2012, Danderfer et al 2009, Alkmim & Martins-Neto 2012, Guadagnin et al 2015, Cruz & Alkmim 2017. Each unconformity-bounded unit has been considered a record of an episode of basin formations within the Congo-São Francisco paleocontinent, beginning at 1.8 Ga. Generally, the Paleo-Mesoproterozoic-age units are mapped as Espinhaço Supergroup, and those of Neoproterozoic age are attributed to the supergroup of São Francisco (Schobbenhaus 1996, Martins-Neto et al 2001, Danderfer & Dardenne 2002, Alkmim & Martins-Neto 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%