New graduate doctors’ preparedness for practice: a multistakeholder, multicentre narrative study

Abstract

ObjectiveWhile previous studies have begun to explore newly graduated junior doctors’ preparedness for practice, findings are largely based on simplistic survey data or perceptions of newly graduated junior doctors and their clinical supervisors alone. This study explores, in a deeper manner, multiple stakeholders’ conceptualisations of what it means to be prepared for practice and their perceptions about newly graduated junior doctors’ preparedness (or unpreparedness) using innovative qualitative methods.DesignA multistakeholder, multicentre qualitative study including narrative interviews and longitudinal audio diaries.SettingFour UK settings: England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.ParticipantsEight stakeholder groups comprising n=185 participants engaged in 101 narrative interviews (27 group and 84 individual). Twenty-six junior doctors in their first year postgraduation also provided audio diaries over a 3-month period.ResultsWe identified 2186 narratives across all participants (506 classified as ‘prepared’, 663 as ‘unprepared’, 951 as ‘general’). Seven themes were identified; this paper focuses on two themes pertinent to our research questions: (1) explicit conceptualisations of preparedness for practice; and (2) newly graduated junior doctors’ preparedness for the General Medical Council’s (GMC) outcomes for graduates. Stakeholders’ conceptualisations of preparedness for practice included short-term (hitting the ground running) and long-term preparedness, alongside being prepared for practical and emotional aspects. Stakeholders’ perceptions of medical graduates’ preparedness for practice varied across different GMC outcomes for graduates (eg, Doctor as Scholar and Scientist, as Practitioner, as Professional) and across stakeholders (eg, newly graduated doctors sometimes perceived themselves as prepared but others did not).ConclusionOur narrative findings highlight the complexities and nuances surrounding new medical graduates’ preparedness for practice. We encourage stakeholders to develop a shared understanding (and realistic expectations) of new medical graduates’ preparedness. We invite medical school leaders to increase the proportion of time that medical students spend participating meaningfully in multiprofessional teams during workplace learning.

Escape into patient safety: bringing human factors to life for medical students

“…The soft skills required to contribute to improving patient safety are often assumed rather than explicitly taught, and students are not given opportunities to develop communication and teamwork skills 18. Though this variation is not unique to patient safety, it contributes to new graduates lacking confidence in their knowledge and skills and feeling unable to contribute to patient safety improvement 14 19…”

Self‐perceived preparedness of undergraduate dental students in dental public universities in Malaysia: A national study

“…Research in undergraduate medical education involving pedagogy, clinical training, curriculum development and assessment methods is ultimately aimed at informing the stakeholders how best to prepare the graduates for their future careers. [3][4][5][6] Dental graduates face a multitude of challenges in order to prepare themselves for a smooth transition from a dental school into practice, and preparedness of dental graduates is a subject of immense interest worldwide. 7 Following the Bologna Declaration, the last two decades have witnessed a strong trend towards Europeanization of higher education.…”

Prepared for practice? UK Foundation doctors’ confidence in dealing with ethical issues in the workplace

“…[7] Findings from a recent qualitative analysis supported this: 'new graduates were relatively unprepared for ethical and legal aspects [of work]' especially in the areas of resuscitation decisions, discharge against medical advice, confidentiality concerns when a patient brought in by the police and cases involving domestic violence. [8] Ethical issues are commonplace in daily clinical practice and the ability to assess and deal with these is a generic skill needed by all doctors from their first day of work (albeit it with appropriate supervision). However, research suggests that FY doctors have trouble dealing with ethical issues they encounter in practice.…”