George VI Sound is an~600 km-long curvilinear channel on the west coast of the southern Antarctic Peninsula separating Alexander Island from Palmer Land. The Sound is a geologically complex region presently covered by the George VI Ice Shelf. Here we model the bathymetry using aerogravity data. Our model is constrained by water depths from seismic measurements. We present a crustal density model for the region, propose a relocation for a major fault in the Sound, and reveal a dense body,~200 km long, flanking the Palmer Land side. The southern half of the Sound consists of two distinct basins~1,100 m deep, separated by a −650 m-deep ridge. This constricting ridge presents a potential barrier to ocean circulation beneath the ice shelf and may account for observed differences in temperature-salinity (T-S) profiles. Plain Language Summary Knowing the seafloor depth beneath ice shelves is crucial for understanding the interaction between the ocean and the overlying ice, as the shape of the sea floor influences water circulation pathways. We present a new bathymetric model of the seafloor beneath George VI Ice Shelf on the Antarctica Peninsula. The data for our model were collected from airborne surveys, including the ice surface elevation, ice thickness, and gravity field measurements. We first present a new geological model of the Sound and use our improved data coverage to relocate a previously interpreted geological fault. The new bathymetry model shows that in the southern segment of the Sound, an area with shallow bathymetry and deep ice might be acting as a barrier to the water flow. This information can change our understanding of the circulation between the northern and southern segments of the Sound and can be used in models of how this impacts the melt in the base of the ice shelf. High basal melt rates around Antarctica have been interpreted as responses to variations in oceanic temperature and circulation (e.g., Holland et al., 2008; Jacobs et al., 2011). Over George VI Ice Shelf, estimated basal melt rates range from 2.8 m/a (Corr et al., 2002) to 6.0 m/a (Dinniman et al., 2012) with a recent study report-ing~4 m/a over a 23 year period (Adusumilli et al., 2018). Future changes in basal melt depend on changes in ocean temperature as well as subsurface currents, steered by the cavity shape, highlighting the importance of accurate bathymetry data for future predictions (e.g.,