2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.05010
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Ideas in Baryogenesis: A Snowmass White Paper

Abstract: The Standard Model of Particle Physics cannot explain the observed baryon asymmetry of the Universe. This observation is a clear sign of new physics beyond the Standard Model. There have been many recent theoretical developments to address this question. Critically, many new physics models that generate the baryon asymmetry have a wide range of repercussions for many areas of theoretical and experimental particle physics. This white paper provides an overview of such recent theoretical developments with an emp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 300 publications
(398 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review introduced a general overview of the mechanism focusing principally on aspects that are less detailed in other documents. Of course, many other mechanisms exist in the market and a recent state-of-the-art can be found in [30]. See e.g., [10] on why N CS is an integer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review introduced a general overview of the mechanism focusing principally on aspects that are less detailed in other documents. Of course, many other mechanisms exist in the market and a recent state-of-the-art can be found in [30]. See e.g., [10] on why N CS is an integer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the same structure for the final number density appears in the DM sector of the MTH. The remaining asymmetric component of the DM plasma sets the final DM number density [7,[25][26][27]. Therefore, the twin ϵ CP will also be proportional to the complex phase of the couplings of the twin sector, which we generically denote as sin ϕ.…”
Section: Jhep11(2023)043mentioning
confidence: 99%