2021
DOI: 10.1002/spp2.1400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New information on the Jurassic lepidosauromorph Marmoretta oxoniensis

Abstract: The earliest known crown-group lepidosaurs are known from the Middle Triassic; however, their stem group is poorly sampled, with only a few representative fossils found. This is partly due to the small size and delicate bones of early stem-lepidosaurs (= non-lepidosaurian lepidosauromorphs), which make both preservation in the fossil record and subsequent discovery less likely. The Middle Jurassic lepidosauromorph Marmoretta oxoniensis is re-examined using high-resolution micro-computed tomography to reveal pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is the first time this issue has been approached with quantitative methods involving such an array of diverse points of view (phylogeny, dating, fossil record, morphospace, disparity, and evolutionary rates). Moreover, most of the Jurassic forms are very difficult to classify, and many of them have been reinterpreted since this was proposed (e.g., Marmoretta , see Griffiths et al, 2021 ). Our methods, however, do not necessarily rely on the achieved identification of each fossil because they feed on the morphological information stored in the character matrix, and not the specific topology derived from its analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is the first time this issue has been approached with quantitative methods involving such an array of diverse points of view (phylogeny, dating, fossil record, morphospace, disparity, and evolutionary rates). Moreover, most of the Jurassic forms are very difficult to classify, and many of them have been reinterpreted since this was proposed (e.g., Marmoretta , see Griffiths et al, 2021 ). Our methods, however, do not necessarily rely on the achieved identification of each fossil because they feed on the morphological information stored in the character matrix, and not the specific topology derived from its analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saurillodon, Oxiella, and Parviraptor. Squamate bones were also reported from roughly contemporaneous deposits on the Isle of Skye, Scotland [23], and new fieldwork on Skye has yielded both isolated elements and associated material, including specimens referable to the Kirtlington genera Balnealacerta, Bellairsia, and Parviraptor [29]. These specimens both validate the original associations [27,28], contra Caldwell et al [30], and add new morphological data for phylogenetic analysis.…”
Section: The Early Squamate Fossil Recordmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…More recently, Simões et al [19] placed three monotypic genera, Sophineta cracoviensis (Lower Triassic, Poland, [20]), Megachirella wachtleri (Upper Triassic, Italy [21]), and Marmoretta oxoniensis (Middle Jurassic, UK [22]) into Squamata. However, re-analyses, based on new data for Marmoretta [23], do not support a squamate attribution for either Marmoretta or Sophineta, and leave the position of Megachirella as equivocal.…”
Section: The Early Squamate Fossil Recordmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Today, all recent phylogenetical analyses recover weigeltisaurids as stem-saurians (e.g. Ezcurra et al, 2014;Schoch and Sues, 2018;Pritchard and Sues, 2019;Sobral et al, 2020;Griffiths et al, 2021), possibly closely related to drepanosauromorphs (Merck, 2003;Senter, 2004;Pritchard et al, 2021) or 'paliguanids' (Müller, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%