2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New inner boundaries of the habitable zones around M dwarfs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion of ozone radiative heating and cooling only has small effects on the IHZ limit. However, our IHZ estimates are closer in (to the respective host stars) than other previous studies−differences stemming from increased water vapor absorption (Kopparapu et al 2017), as well as improved CAM5 aerosol microphysics and cloud treatment (Bin et al 2018). Similarly, disparities between previous GCM calculations of the IHZ (e.g., Toon 2015 andLeconte et al 2013a) can be largely attributed to treatment of moist physics and clouds (Yang et al 2019b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The inclusion of ozone radiative heating and cooling only has small effects on the IHZ limit. However, our IHZ estimates are closer in (to the respective host stars) than other previous studies−differences stemming from increased water vapor absorption (Kopparapu et al 2017), as well as improved CAM5 aerosol microphysics and cloud treatment (Bin et al 2018). Similarly, disparities between previous GCM calculations of the IHZ (e.g., Toon 2015 andLeconte et al 2013a) can be largely attributed to treatment of moist physics and clouds (Yang et al 2019b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The maximum stellar flux investigated by , 1,400 W m −2 , is only about 40-50 % of the stellar flux at the inner edge, according to results from atmosphere-only models Kopparapu et al 2017;Bin et al 2018). Our new experiments show that the day-to-night oceanic heat transport (OHT) at the higher stellar fluxes of planets near the inner edge is much weaker than that for a stellar flux of 1,400 W m −2 (see section 3.2) and that the location of the inner edge would not be shifted by ocean dynamics, at least for a rotation period of 60 Earth days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Three dimensional models obtain outer edge results that are also consistent with those from 1-D models (Wolf 2018). The situation is very different for inner edge calculations, however, as differences in convective, cloud, and radiation schemes produce a wide scatter across different 1-D and 3-D models (Yang et al 2013;Kopparapu et al 2016;Kopparapu et al 2017;Bin et al 2018;Ramirez 2018a). These differences partially arise from the difficulty in simulating the water vapour feedback at higher temperatures, which is not a major concern at the HZ outer edge, where water vapour absorption is weaker (Godolt et al 2016;Ramirez and Levi 2018).…”
Section: Comparison Between 1-d and 3-d Models On The Habitable Zone mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Wolf and Toon (2015) used the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) GCM to calculate a solar system inner edge at ~0.93 AU upon triggering the moist greenhouse. Other CAM GCM calculations find the moist greenhouse for K -M stars hotter than ~ 3000 K or for all M-stars respectively (Fujii et al 2017;Kopparapu et al 2017;Bin et al 2018). Thus, the disagreement between models is large and it remains unclear as to whether the moist greenhouse is achievable or not (and if it is, under which circumstances?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation