2010
DOI: 10.1029/2010gl044666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New insight into lunar impact melt mobility from the LRO camera

Abstract: [1] The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) is systematically imaging impact melt deposits in and around lunar craters at meter and sub-meter scales. These images reveal that lunar impact melts, although morphologically similar to terrestrial lava flows of similar size, exhibit distinctive features (e.g., erosional channels). Although generated in a single rapid event, the post-impact mobility and morphology of lunar impact melts is surprisingly complex. We present evidence for multi-stage influx of imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the majority of the highly shocked and melt-rich materials preferentially remain in the original transient crater (e.g., Grieve et al, 1977), but volumes of these materials scale disproportionately with increasing transient cavity diameter (e.g., Cintala and Grieve, 1998). Consequently, as crater diameter increases, additional highly shocked and melt-rich deposits are emplaced both within and outside of the final crater, which is consistent with theoretical, numerical (Grieve and Cintala, 1992;Cintala and Grieve, 1998) and empirical observations (Hawke and Head, 1977;Cintala and Grieve, 1998;Bray et al, 2010;Osinski et al, 2011).…”
Section: An Impact Origin For Crater-related Pitted Materialssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In general, the majority of the highly shocked and melt-rich materials preferentially remain in the original transient crater (e.g., Grieve et al, 1977), but volumes of these materials scale disproportionately with increasing transient cavity diameter (e.g., Cintala and Grieve, 1998). Consequently, as crater diameter increases, additional highly shocked and melt-rich deposits are emplaced both within and outside of the final crater, which is consistent with theoretical, numerical (Grieve and Cintala, 1992;Cintala and Grieve, 1998) and empirical observations (Hawke and Head, 1977;Cintala and Grieve, 1998;Bray et al, 2010;Osinski et al, 2011).…”
Section: An Impact Origin For Crater-related Pitted Materialssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Most impact melts settle on impact crater floors, although some are ejected from the crater during the excavation stage, or pushed up and over the crater rim during the modification stage, followed by accumulation in topographic lows (e.g., Howard and Wilshire, 1975;Hawke and Head, 1977;Osinski et al, 2011). Morphologically impact melts can appear similar to some types of volcanic flows (i.e., lobate lava flows, sheet flows, and lava ponds: Howard and Wilshire, 1975;Hawke and Head, 1977;Bray et al, 2010;Carter et al, 2012;Denevi et al, 2012), although their source regions are traceable to impact craters rather than volcanic vents. Some of the highest resolution Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera-Narrow Angle Camera (LROC-NAC) images, however, show that lunar impact melts can have a highly variable texture, from smooth to rough at the meter scale to very rough at the decimeter scale (Carter et al, 2012).…”
Section: Impact Meltsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lunar impact melt flows (Fig. 1) typically contain a variety of blocks transported by the partially-molten flow (Dence, 1971;Howard and Wilshire, 1975;Hawke and Head, 1977;Bray et al, 2010).…”
Section: Impact Meltsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unit has deficiently developed terraces and has higher albedo than other parts of crater walls. When moving down slope, impact melts are thought to be both erosive and depositional (Bray et al, 2010). In Fig.9, we can see that impact melts erode into the walls deeply, but it is unclear if the erosion into the wall is mechanical or thermal, or a combination of the two.…”
Section: Crater Floor Unitsmentioning
confidence: 95%