New insights into executive compensation and firm performance

Abstract

Purpose -This paper aims to examine the relation between executive compensation, firm size and firm performance on a panel of the so-called ''new economy'' firms in the USA over the period 1996-2002. Design/methodology/approach -The authors use two measures of performance, total shareholder return and return on assets, and concentrate on total CEO compensation, which includes stock option compensation, as equity-based compensation practices have been prevalent in new economy firms. The estimation process uses both the feasible generalized least squares method of Parks and Kmenta and the panel corrected standard error method of Beck and Katz. These methodologies investigate error structures that do not conform to the classical ordinary least squares assumptions. Findings -The econometric results indicate that estimates on firm size are robust to alternative specifications of the error structures. There is evidence however that the effect of firm size on CEO compensation is more significant after the stock market crash of 2000. The opposite holds true for the estimates on firm performance. In addition, estimates on firm performance are more sensitive to the estimation method and the specification of the error structures.Research limitations/implications -The research presented in this paper is a first step in the direction of understanding the pay to performance relation in the ''new economy'' industries in the USA. Additional research is warranted, which should extend both the time series and the cross section aspects of the data. Originality/value -The paper fills an important gap in the existing literature by providing rigorous econometric evidence on the pay to performance relation in the so-called ''new economy'' industries. The evidence provided in this paper is relevant as it complements the findings in the literature on executive compensation in the so-called ''old economy'' industries, which typically make up the samples of most previous studies.

How Closely Is Ceo Compensation Tied to Performance? an Examination of the U.S. Restaurant Industry

“…In a similar study by Nourayi and Daroca (2008), the authors also find a positive significant relationship between the log of sales and cash and total compensation. In a third recent study, Canarella and Gasparyan (2008) also find a positive and significant relationship between the change in the log of sales and the change in total CEO compensation. Gu and Choi (2004) find that in the casino industry, CEO compensation was positive and significant at the .001 level in relation to firm size, measured as total assets.…”

The impact of corporate governance on state-owned and non-state-owned firms efficiency in China

“…Kuo, Lin, Lien, Wang, and Yeh (2014) examine the relation using a non-linear model and their results show a significant inverse U-shaped relationship between executive pay and firm performance. Many studies have presented a close relationship between executive compensation and performance (Canarella & Gasparyan, 2008;Hall & Liebman, 1998;Iyengar, Williams, & Zampelli, 2005;Jensen & Murphy, 1990;Kato & Long, 2006b;Lilling, 2006;Matolcsy & Wright, 2011;Merhebi, Pattenden, Swan, & Zhou, 2006;Ozkan, 2011;Yang et al, 2011).…”

CEO Compensation: Does Financial Crisis Matter?

“…There is substantial evidence in earlier studies that firm size and CEO compensation are positively related (e.g., Finkelstein & Hambrick, 1989;Lambert et al, 1991;Canarella & Gasparyan, 2008;Nourayi & Mintz, 2008). Based on the previous studies, we formulate the following hypothesis.…”