2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03656.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Insights Into the Effect of Calcium Hydroxide Precipitation on the Kinetics of Tricalcium Silicate Hydration

Abstract: Where it is convenient and not likely to cause confusion, conventional cement chemistry notation is used, i.e. C 5 CaO, S 5 SiO 2 , and H 5 H 2 O.y At least one review 3 divides Stage I into Stages 0 and 1, the former being the time before the initial peak in calorimetry curves, and the latter being the time between that peak and Stage 2.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, during stage 2, commonly referred to as the induction period, the rate of hydration slows significantly, although the mechanism responsible for reduced hydration is still under debate. 51,52 Until recently, it has been widely hypothesized that a continuous, metastable passivation layer of hydration products forms on the C 3 S particle surfaces to inhibit further hydration. 52−55 More recently, it has been suggested that the induction period is associated predominantly with C 3 S dissolution from etch-pit steps, which is influenced by the degree of undersaturation of the solution with respect to C 3 S. 51 During the induction period, the solution becomes locally saturated with respect to C−S−H and the hydrates likely begin to precipitate onto particle surfaces, processes that are thought not to be directly responsible for the induction period itself.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, during stage 2, commonly referred to as the induction period, the rate of hydration slows significantly, although the mechanism responsible for reduced hydration is still under debate. 51,52 Until recently, it has been widely hypothesized that a continuous, metastable passivation layer of hydration products forms on the C 3 S particle surfaces to inhibit further hydration. 52−55 More recently, it has been suggested that the induction period is associated predominantly with C 3 S dissolution from etch-pit steps, which is influenced by the degree of undersaturation of the solution with respect to C 3 S. 51 During the induction period, the solution becomes locally saturated with respect to C−S−H and the hydrates likely begin to precipitate onto particle surfaces, processes that are thought not to be directly responsible for the induction period itself.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gartner et al [23] and Gartner and Jennings [39] have shown that the degree of instability of the metastable C-S-H layer (termed the initial shell in this paper) is related to its Ca/Si ratio, and that lower Ca/Si ratios lead to less instability of the C-S-H layer. Garrault and Nonat [40] and Bullard and Flatt [41], in studies on C 3 S hydration in dilute solution (liquid/solid = 50), pointed out that nucleation and growth of C-S-H nuclei at the initial period are faster at low lime (Ca(OH) 2 ) concentrations. It is difficult to extrapolate these findings to explain the hydration kinetics of the fly ash-cement pastes presented here.…”
Section: ) the Dilution Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the fly ash could supply significant amounts of silicate ions to the solution since the early age [41]. This effect also leads to a lower Ca/Si ratio of the solution and in the initial shell of fly ash-cement pastes [23,39], and results in a longer induction period for the hydration in fly ash-OPC pastes.…”
Section: Effect Of Fly Ash On the Reaction Coefficients Of Hydration mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, Bullard has demonstrated that either the metastable barrier layer or hydroxylated surface hypothesis can adequately predict alite hydration rates, there being only minor differences in the predicted evolution of the solution chemistry [18]. But there were certain assumptions or implicit mechanistic functionality that were necessary to also make either mechanism work; establishing that such mechanisms are present is a challenge to be proven empirically.…”
Section: Ii2 Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%