2003
DOI: 10.1039/b300431g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New insights into the solution equilibrium of molybdenum(vi)–hydroxamate systems: 1H and 17O NMR spectroscopic study of Mo(vi)–desferrioxamine B and Mo(vi)–monohydroxamic acid systems

Abstract: To complement our previous pH-potentiometric and spectrophotometric investigations, in the present work 17 O NMR studies on Mo()-desferrioxamine B (DFB) and Mo()-acetohydroxamic acid (Aha) systems, and 1 H NMR on Mo()-Aha, Mo()-benzohydroxamic acid (Bha) and -N-methylacetohydroxamic acid (MeAha) have been performed. Complete equilibrium models for all the studied systems are presented in this paper. Formation of a hydrogen bond could be suggested between the hydroxamate-NH of the coordinated primary mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The registered pH-potentiometric titration curves, similarly to the few previous results on Mo(VI)-monohydroxamic acid systems [30], indicated very strong interaction between the studied ligands and Mo(VI), but only under acidic conditions. No difference between the curves for the ligands or those registered in the Mo(VI)-containing samples was observed above pH ca.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The registered pH-potentiometric titration curves, similarly to the few previous results on Mo(VI)-monohydroxamic acid systems [30], indicated very strong interaction between the studied ligands and Mo(VI), but only under acidic conditions. No difference between the curves for the ligands or those registered in the Mo(VI)-containing samples was observed above pH ca.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…1), which is a surrogate for a metal ion's hardness (Duckworth et al 2009bHernlem et al 1999;Hider 1984). The difficulty in overcoming this trend in affinity in favor of a target metal is illustrated by the Table 1 Selected logb for a selection of metallophores with diverse metal ions Anderegg et al 1963;Bellenger et al 2007;Buglyo et al 1995;Carrano et al 1996;Choi et al 2006;Duckworth et al 2009c;Duckworth and Sposito 2005b;Enyedy et al 2004;Evers et al 1989;Farkas et al 2003;Harrington et al 2012b;Hernlem et al 1996;Jarvis and Hancock 1991;Kim et al 2009;Murakami et al 1989;Pesch et al 2012;Shenker et al 1996;Szabo and Farkas 2011;Whisenhunt et al 1996;Yoshimura et al 2011 …”
Section: Structural Factors Controlling Metallophore Complexation Of mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unlike A. vinelandii, many soil bacteria produce hydroxamate siderophores, which have a lower affinity for oxoanions than catechol siderophores. DFB, for example, does not bind Mo at neutral pH (Farkas et al 2003). It is possible that the production of siderophores with different oxoanion affinities affect the fitness of N 2 -fixing bacteria in soils with different concentrations of Mo, V and W. In turn, the variability in metal requirements among microorganisms (e.g., high Mo requirement in N 2 -fixing bacteria) and in metal concentrations and speciation in various locals (e.g., Fe oxides vs. Fe-NOM complexes) may explain the variety in siderophore structures found in bacteria.…”
Section: Effect Of Siderophores On Metal Speciation In Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%