“…Concurrent sites of instability may also interact and induce stress redistributions that lead a landslide to "self-stabilize" [22][23][24] . Efforts 1, 7 to improve the INV approach give prima facie evidence to suggest that more accurate forecasts can be achieved when the spatial characteristics of slope displacements are incorporated in the temporal analysis of monitoring data.Accordingly, recent work focused on the spatiotemporal evolution of landslide kinematics in PFR in two case studies using: (a) ground-based radar data of a rockfall in an open pit mine (Mine 1) where two sites of instability emerged, leading one to self-stabilize before the larger one collapsed; and (b) satellitebased Sentinel 1 radar data (Xinmo) of the catastrophic collapse in Xinmo, which led to 83 fatalities 4, 24-28 .Guided by lessons learned from the physics and dynamics of granular failure, these delivered a reliable early prediction of the location and geometry of the failure region 4,24,25,27,28 , as well as regime change points in PFR 4,25,26,28 . In this study, we build on these efforts to develop a holistic data-driven framework which eliminates the uncertainties associated with a postulated stress-strain model for the slope, yet holds explicit connections to the first principles of fracture and failure mechanics of heterogeneous and disordered granular solids (e.g., [13][14][15][16] and references therein).…”