2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.03.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New insights on the thermodynamic barrier for nucleation in glasses: The case of lithium disilicate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Refs. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The reported studies concern, in particular, crystalline Li 2 Si 2 O 5 compound and Li 2 Si 2 O 5 based glasses exhibiting good mechanical properties and applicable e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The reported studies concern, in particular, crystalline Li 2 Si 2 O 5 compound and Li 2 Si 2 O 5 based glasses exhibiting good mechanical properties and applicable e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative general approach to reconcile experiment and theory can be given by employing the generalized Gibbs' approach for the determination of the work of critical cluster formation [7]. In this approach it is shown that the bulk properties of the critical clusters considerably deviate from the properties of the newly evolving macroscopic phases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stresses may strongly affect the kinetics of phase transitions in condensed sys-tems [1]. In more detail, the influence of internal elastic stresses on crystal nucleation and growth rates in glasses is considered from both theoretical and experimental points of view, for example, in [2][3][4][5][6][7]. A detailed overview on different investigations on the effect of elastic stresses on segregation and crystallization processes in glassforming melts is given in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the problems with these barriers (e.g., varying G' after [18] or an anomalous increase of W* with a decreasing temperature at about T g [24]) are outside of our method for the estimation of the CCR since V m relates only to the initial reorientation stage with the ΔG # barrier which determines the boundary between glassy and crystalline states. Thus, V m is the upper theoretical limit for the CCR and in this sense V m satisfies the condition set by Vreeswijk et al [4] concerning the absence of even one critical nucleus when determining the CCR.…”
Section: Induction Period Transient Effects and Initial Reorientationmentioning
confidence: 99%