2009
DOI: 10.1353/hph.0.0123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Interpretations of Berkeley's Thought (review)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This, combined with an ontological principle of parsimony, or Ockham's Razor, naturally invites serious consideration of an alternative monism— mental monism, or ‘mentalism,’ as Robert Adams prefers to call it (Adams, ). Secondly, numerous recent philosophical analyses of Berkeley's arguments have lent renewed credence to the claim that his immaterialist thesis, or at least some form of mentalist monism, is true (e.g., Berman, ; Daniel, ; Daniel, ; Foster, ; Rickless, ; Roberts, ; Ward, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, combined with an ontological principle of parsimony, or Ockham's Razor, naturally invites serious consideration of an alternative monism— mental monism, or ‘mentalism,’ as Robert Adams prefers to call it (Adams, ). Secondly, numerous recent philosophical analyses of Berkeley's arguments have lent renewed credence to the claim that his immaterialist thesis, or at least some form of mentalist monism, is true (e.g., Berman, ; Daniel, ; Daniel, ; Foster, ; Rickless, ; Roberts, ; Ward, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%