2010
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-0913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Intrauterine Growth Curves Based on United States Data

Abstract: The Lubchenco curves may not represent the current US population. The new intrauterine growth curves created and validated in this study, based on a contemporary, large, racially diverse US sample, provide clinicians with an updated tool for growth assessment in US NICUs. Research into the ability of the new definitions of small-for-gestational-age and large-for-gestational-age to identify high-risk infants in terms of short-term and long-term health outcomes is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
630
3
29

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 782 publications
(675 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
13
630
3
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Neonatal anthropometrics included HC and weight at birth. Fetal and neonatal HC percentiles were evaluated using a contemporary standard based on growth curves derived from a large, racially diverse US sample adjusted for gestational age and gender (40). Microcephaly was defined as birth HC ≤3rd percentile.…”
Section: Anthropometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neonatal anthropometrics included HC and weight at birth. Fetal and neonatal HC percentiles were evaluated using a contemporary standard based on growth curves derived from a large, racially diverse US sample adjusted for gestational age and gender (40). Microcephaly was defined as birth HC ≤3rd percentile.…”
Section: Anthropometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small head size was defined as birth HC ≤10th percentile. SGA was defined as estimated fetal weight (intrauterine growth restriction) or birth weight ≤10th percentile using the Olsen standard (40). LBW was considered to be <2,500 g. Poor head growth and poor weight gain were defined as trajectory decreases over time in HC or weight z-score, respectively, >0.67 (equivalent to crossing two major percentile lines) from midgestation to birth using Olsen standards (40,41).…”
Section: Anthropometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used British charts from 1990 (29) as also used in many other studies, including the EPICURE study (16). More recent standards produced from the United States (30) are based on larger numbers, but their ethnic mix is different from that in the UK study and so they were not suitable. The infants included in the current study had been entered into a randomized trial examining the efficacy of high-frequency oscillation and conventional mechanical ventilation as modes of respiratory support for very prematurely born infants (31).…”
Section: Sga and Respiratory Morbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed a prospective neonatal cross-sectional study that allowed us to obtain an accurate assessment of GA and HC. Despite its limitations, this is one of the most widelyaccepted methods used to create growth curves that are aimed at determining HC at birth and post-birth 15 . We studied the following two distinct population groups: families of lower socioeconomic status who were assisted by the public health care system in the Maternity Hospital of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, which is a reference hospital in Natal, Brazil, and families of higher socioeconomic status who were served by the private health care system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%