1988
DOI: 10.1016/0266-4356(88)90002-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New intravenous sedative combinations in oral surgery: A comparative study of nalbuphine or pentazocine with midazolam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 18 ] in their study found that efficacy of postoperative analgesia was significantly superior for Nalbuphine (20 mg) than pentazocine (30 mg) on intramuscular injection. Hook and Lavery[ 19 ] compared the analgesic efficacy of nalbuphine (0.2 mg/kg) with midazolam, and they found that patients in nalbuphine group were more pain-free as compared to pentazocine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 18 ] in their study found that efficacy of postoperative analgesia was significantly superior for Nalbuphine (20 mg) than pentazocine (30 mg) on intramuscular injection. Hook and Lavery[ 19 ] compared the analgesic efficacy of nalbuphine (0.2 mg/kg) with midazolam, and they found that patients in nalbuphine group were more pain-free as compared to pentazocine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%