2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2012.05509.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New kinematic constraints of the western Doruneh fault, northeastern Iran, from interseismic deformation analysis

Abstract: SUMMARY We used the SBAS DInSAR analysis technique to estimate the interseismic deformation along the western part of the Doruneh fault system (DFS), northeastern Iran. We processed 90 ENVISAT images from four different frames from ascending and descending orbits. Three of the ground velocity maps show a significant interseismic signal. Using a simple dislocation approach we model 2‐D velocity profiles concerning three InSAR data set relative to the western part of the DFS, obtaining a good fit to the observat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to estimate the current slip rate of the major identified faults, we simulated the surface deformation associated with an uniform slip over the regional thrust detachment, by using a simple 2‐D modeling approach, largely applied to different tectonic domains worldwide (e.g., Anderlini et al, 2020; Fialko, 2006; Pezzo et al, 2012; Ponraj et al, 2019; Vergne et al, 2001). The computation of a 2‐D profile model allowed us to simulated an infinite wide (perpendicular to the profile) regional thrust detachment, avoiding lateral deformation effects (Figure 6).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate the current slip rate of the major identified faults, we simulated the surface deformation associated with an uniform slip over the regional thrust detachment, by using a simple 2‐D modeling approach, largely applied to different tectonic domains worldwide (e.g., Anderlini et al, 2020; Fialko, 2006; Pezzo et al, 2012; Ponraj et al, 2019; Vergne et al, 2001). The computation of a 2‐D profile model allowed us to simulated an infinite wide (perpendicular to the profile) regional thrust detachment, avoiding lateral deformation effects (Figure 6).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seismotectonic scenario of the study area is characterized by complex kinematics, varying from pure reverse to pure sinistral faulting, and fault segmentation (Farbod et al, ). The major seismogenic structures are observed to the north of the DF trace, corresponding to the NE‐SW sinistral faults (Dahan‐Qaleh and Taknar faults), and to the west of it, along the reverse, NW‐SE striking, Kharturan Fault (Farbod et al, , ; Fattahi et al, ; Pezzo et al, ) (Figure ).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geodetic measurements (Mousavi et al, ) and solutions of earthquake focal mechanism (Shabanian et al, ; Zamani, Angelier, & Zamani, ) suggest that the N‐S shortening is still active and responsible for the current stress regime and seismotectonic scenario within the DF region (see also Farbod et al, ). The seismotectonic scenario is characterized by fault segmentation and along‐strike kinematic variation from reverse to sinistral faulting along the DF, kinematically linked to the NE–SW sinistral Dahan‐Qaleh Fault and interrupted against the NNW–SSE‐oriented Kharturan reverse fault (Farbod et al, , ; Pezzo et al, ) (Figure ).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deformation zone thins towards the southwest, where the thickness of the deformation zone is about 6 km. It terminates against the NNW–SSE striking, active reverse Kharturan Fault, which is assumed to absorb the southwest motion of northern block of the DF to the west of the Dahan‐Qaleh Fault (Farbod et al, ; Pezzo et al, ). The deformation zone fades out toward the east, cutting across the middle Eocene KAIC (Tadayon et al, ).…”
Section: Structural Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%