2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New lumbar method for monitoring cerebrospinal fluid pressure in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, it is cheaper, more accessible and requires less complex logistics for experiments, allowing for a decrease in cost and increase in sample size of preliminary studies. Third, the basal values of CSF pressure that we found in the rat (in horizontal position) as well as those reported in the literature range from 4 to 7 mmHg [40,41,48] which is close to the values reported in cats [20], pigs [46] and humans [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, it is cheaper, more accessible and requires less complex logistics for experiments, allowing for a decrease in cost and increase in sample size of preliminary studies. Third, the basal values of CSF pressure that we found in the rat (in horizontal position) as well as those reported in the literature range from 4 to 7 mmHg [40,41,48] which is close to the values reported in cats [20], pigs [46] and humans [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This emphasises the need for measuring CSF pressure caudal and rostral to the lesion. In our study, we only measured the CSF pressure caudal to the lesion but in rat, it is also possible to measure CSF pressure rostral to the injury level: Barth et al [40] have proposed a technique to measure CSF pressure in the cisterna magna by inserting a catheter through the atlantooccipital membrane, whereas Kusaka et al [48] have simultaneously measured intracranial and spinal CSF pressure. In our study, the Th10 level of the experimental SCI does not preclude the surgical approach of the atlantooccipital membrane and the relevance of the present model should be strongly improved by including the measurement of the CSF pressure rostral to the lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A telemetric physiologic monitoring system with implantable pressure transmitters (PA-C10 and C-50PXT Data Sciences International, St Paul, USA) was used for blood, CSF, or brain parenchyma pressure measurement. Catheters (0.4 mm outer diameter) were inserted into the subarachnoid space at the fifth lumbar vertebra (Kusaka et al 2004), the cisterna magna after partial laminectomy of first cervical vertebra, or the left frontal cerebrum through a 0.5 mm hole in the skull, and anchored with a ligature and cyanoacrylate glue (Vet Bond, 3M Health Care, St Paul, MN). The transmitter was placed in a skin pouch over the lumbar area or scapular area.…”
Section: Animal Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this animal model, we have observed a marked effect of PP1 on brain edema as shown in Figure 2. Neurological scoring is routinely employed in animal models studying neurological disorders, such as middle cerebral artery occlusion model for ischemic stroke [14], endovascular perforation model for subarachnoid hemorrhage [25], and spinal cord injury models [3]. However, these scoring systems were inappropriate for the present model as the affected brain area is localized and the type of injury is different.…”
Section: Brain Injuries Produced By This Animal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%