1992
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(92)90571-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New measurement of the electric dipole moment of the neutron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the neutron [323] d n ≈ 2 100 GeV m 6) in which m denotes a general soft supersymmetry-breaking mass and φ can be any of the reparameterization invariant phase combinations in Eq. (2.13), the bounds for the electron [324,325] and neutron [326,327] EDMs |d e | < 4.3 × 10 −27 e − cm (95% c.l.) (5.7) |d n | < 6.3 × 10 −26 e − cm (90% c.l.)…”
Section: Cp Violation and Electric Dipole Momentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…the neutron [323] d n ≈ 2 100 GeV m 6) in which m denotes a general soft supersymmetry-breaking mass and φ can be any of the reparameterization invariant phase combinations in Eq. (2.13), the bounds for the electron [324,325] and neutron [326,327] EDMs |d e | < 4.3 × 10 −27 e − cm (95% c.l.) (5.7) |d n | < 6.3 × 10 −26 e − cm (90% c.l.)…”
Section: Cp Violation and Electric Dipole Momentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…III, this model is completely specified by six parameters: M 0 , M 1/2 , |A 0 |, tan β and the phases ϕ A 0 and ϕ µ . The experimental bounds obtained in [1] 14), which enters the neutralino contribution. (ii) The neutralino contribution is proportional to the selectron mixing angle sin 2θẽ, which is usually rather small.…”
Section: Edm Analysis Within Msugramentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although motivated by the sizeable forward-backward asymmetry, W and Z models must face a number of stringent experimental constraints, including precision electroweak observables [39]; the neutron electric dipole moment [40,41]; same-sign top production [42,43]; the top-quark pair production cross-section at the Tevatron [44,45] and LHC [46,47]; and the top-quark charge asymmetry at the LHC [48,49]. As recent analyses have pointed out [31,32,50], there is already tension between existing constraints and theoretical predictions, such that significant fractions of parameter space in such models are already being ruled out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%